Selection of Non-Conventional Machining Process Considering Machining Processes by using Additive Ratio Assessment - Approach

Authors

  • M. Mahalingam  Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamilnadu, India

Keywords:

Non-Traditional Machining Processes, Multi Criteria Decision Making Processes-Additive Ratio Assessment Method.

Abstract

Many of the recent developments in the Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering industries are partly due to the increasing use of difficult

References

  1. Aghdaie, M. H., Zolfani, S. H and Zavadskas, E. K.(2013), Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods. Engineering Economics, Vol. 24(1) ,pp.5-17.
  2. Asis Sarkar,S.C., Panjab.,Dibyendu Das., and Bijon Sarkar. (2015). Developing an efficient decision support system for non-traditional machine selection: an application of MOORA and MOOSRA. Production and Manufacturing Research, Vol. 3(1), pp.324–342.
  3. Chatterjee, P., Chakraborty, S. (2012).Material selection using preferential ranking methods, Materials and Design, Vol.35(4),pp. 384-393.
  4. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Esfahani, M. H., Bitarafan M., Zavadskas, E. K., Arefi, S. L. (2013), Developing a new hybrid MCDM method for selection of the optimal alternative of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants during automobile accidents. Transport ,Vol.28(1) ,pp. 89-96.
  5. Huang, D. K., Chiu, H. N., Yeh, R. H and Chang, J. H. (2009).A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for solving a bi-objective personnel assignment problem. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 56(1), pp.1-10.
  6. Kersuliene, V., Turskis, Z. (2011), Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection, Technological and Economic Development of Economy Vol.17(4), pp.645-666.
  7. Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010),Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step - wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 11(2), pp.243-258.
  8. Rao, R.V. (2008). A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method, Materials and Design, Vol.29(10), pp.1949-1954.
  9. Saaty, T.L. (1980). Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  10. Stanujkic,D., Dordevic,B., and Mira Dordevic,M., (2013).Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: a case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian Journal of Management, Vol. 8 (2), pp.213 – 241.
  11. Madic,M., Gecevska,V., Radovanovic,M., and Petkovic, D.(2014). Multi-criteria economic analysis of machining processes using the WASPAS method. Journal of Production Engineering, Vol. 17(2), pp.79-82
  12. Milos Madic., and Miroslav Radovanovic. (2015). Ranking of some most commonly used non-traditional machining processes using ROV and CRITIC methods. U.P.B. Science Bulletin Series D, Vol. 77(2), pp.193-204.
  13. Prasenjit Chatterjee., and Shankar Chakraborty. (2013). Gear Material Selection using Complex Proportional Assessment and Additive Ratio Assessment-based Approaches: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 1(2), pp.104-111.
  14. Petkovic,D., Madic,M., and Radenkovic,G. (2015). Selection of the Most Suitable Non-Conventional Machining Processes for Ceramics by Using MCDMs. Machining Science of Sintering, Vol. 47, pp.229-235.
  15. Stanujkic,D., and Jovanovic, R. (2012). Measuring a Quality of Faculty Website Using ARAS Method. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education '2012, selected papers, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania, pp. 545-554.
  16. Turskis, Z., and Zavadskas, E. K. (2010b). A new fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: the analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport, Vol. 25(4), pp.423-432.
  17. Turskis, Z. and Zavadskas, E. K. (2010a). A novel method for Multiple Criteria Analysis: Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) method. Informatica, Vol. 21(4), pp.597-610.
  18. Zavadskas, E.K., and Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 16(2), pp.159-172.
  19. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., and Vilutiene, T. (2010). Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 10(3), pp.123-141.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Downloads

Published

2016-12-30

Issue

Volume 2, Issue 6 , November-December-2016

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRST

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
M. Mahalingam, " Selection of Non-Conventional Machining Process Considering Machining Processes by using Additive Ratio Assessment - Approach , International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 2, Issue 6 , pp.578-584, November-December-2016.