Home > Archives > IJSRST162317 IJSRST-Library

Performance Appraisal System in Medical College Libraries in Karnataka State - A study

Authors(3) :-Pushpalatha K, Poornima G. Rao, T. Y. Mallaiah

It is necessary to understand the socio-economic and personal elements, which influence an employee's behaviour and opinion. Libraries need professionally qualified librarians to plan, direct and supervise various library operations where professional knowledge is important. The number of such professionals required in each library depends on the tasks to be performed. The present study has concentrated only on the professionals and semi-professionals and did not cover the non-professionals and management people. This paper reports on the respondent's views and perceptions on common pitfalls of performance appraisal, its concerns and issues and also common rating errors influencing job satisfaction).
Pushpalatha K, Poornima G. Rao, T. Y. Mallaiah
Socio-Economic, Age-Wise Distribution, Health Sciences Standards, Personal Observation, Regression Analysis , Lack of Seriousness
  1. Gopinath, M. A. (1990). Towards Performance Appraisal in libraries. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 27(3), 183-191.
  2. Leanne E. A. & Joan F. B. (2005).Antecedents and consequences of reactions   to developmental 360° feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3),   532-548.
  3. Lyons, T. F. & Callahan, T. J. (1996). A Third Role in Performance Appraisal: Suggestion from the Medical Care Quality Appraisal Systems. Public Personnel Management, 25(2), 133.
  4. Moynihan, D.P. (2008). The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance e information? Journal of public administration research & theory, 20, 849-866.
  5. Robertson, P. (1980). Systematic Induction, Guidelines for Training in Libraries.   London: Library Association.
  6. Valerie A. L., Marie F. & Cynthia K. R. (2011). Special report: symposium on   transformational change in health sciences libraries: space, collections, and   roles. Med.Libr. Assoc., 99(1), 82-87.
  7. Williams, D. & O'Connor, D. (2003). Accreditation and the academic   library. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (pp. 64-75). New   York: Marcel Dekker.
  8. Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W., & Dubinsky, A. (1998). Transformational and contingent reward leadership: Individual, dyad, and group levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 27-54.
  9. Yehuda, B. (1996). Self-performance appraisal vs direct-manager appraisal: A case of congruence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(6), 50 – 65.
  10. Yeung, A., Brockbank, J. W., & Ulrich, D. O. (1991). Organizational culture and human resources practices: An empirical assessment. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 59-81.
  11. Zhu, Y., Chen, I., & Warner, M. (2000). human resource management in Taiwan: An empirical case study. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(4), 32–44.
Publication Details
  Published in : Volume 2 | Issue 3 | May-June 2016
  Date of Publication : 2017-12-31
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 59-64
Manuscript Number : IJSRST162317
Publisher : Technoscience Academy
PRINT ISSN : 2395-6011
ONLINE ISSN : 2395-602X
Cite This Article :
Pushpalatha K, Poornima G. Rao, T. Y. Mallaiah, "Performance Appraisal System in Medical College Libraries in Karnataka State - A study", International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp.59-64, May-June-2016
URL : http://ijsrst.com/IJSRST162317