Home > Archives > IJSRST17319 IJSRST-Library

Comparison of Measured Values of CTDI and DPL with Standard Reference values of Different CT Scanners for dose Management

Authors(5) :-Issahaku Shirazu, Y. B Mensah, Cyril Schandorf, S. Y. Mensah, Alfred Owusu

The study is based on estimate of CTDI and DLP values for patients' dose optimization procedures. Technical parameters were obtained for three groups of randomly selected patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations of 320 patients of age 20-80 years. The measured values were obtained on image data and the standard reference values of various machines were obtained from service manual as part of QC/QA and the recommended values from ICRP publication 103. The mean CTDI and DLP parameters were; 6.33mGy and 936.25mGy respectively. Furthermore, the mean recorded values of CTDIVOL values were well within ICRP recommendation when the protocol was completed in one scan. On the other hand, in the case of multiscan the total CTDIVol was higher than the ICRP recommendations. While the mean DLP values were higher than the recommended value of 780 mGy-cm by ICRP publication 103. Finally, approximately 37% of the total varied CTDI and DLP values were higher than the recommended dose by ICRP publication 103.
Issahaku Shirazu, Y. B Mensah, Cyril Schandorf, S. Y. Mensah, Alfred Owusu
CTDIVOL, DLP, ICRP, Dose Optimisation, Air Karma Index
  1. Mullenders L, Atkinson M, Paretzke H, Sabatier L, Bouffler S. Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009; 9: Page: 596–604.
  2. Rothkamm K, Lobrich M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003; 100: Pages: 5057–5062.
  3. Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Tzedakis A, Papadakis A, Theocharopoulos N, Gourtsoyannis N, 2007, “Determination of the weighted CT Dose Index in modern multi detector CT scanners”, Physics in Medicine and Radiology, 2007, 52: Pages: 6485- 6495.
  4. AAPM Report No. 39, “Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners”, 1993
  5. AAPM Report No.96, “The measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT”, 2008
  6. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007; 37(2–4):1–332
  7. Origgi D, Vigorito S, Villa G, Bellomi M, Tosi G, Survey of Computed Tomography techniques and absorbed dose in Italian hospitals: a comparison between two methods to estimate the dose-length product and the effective dose and to verify fulfillment of the diagnostic reference levels, Eur. Radiol., 2006,
  8. Bushberg JT, et al. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 3rd Ed. Section 3.3.
Publication Details
  Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 1 | January-February 2017
  Date of Publication : 2017-02-28
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 185-190
Manuscript Number : IJSRST17319
Publisher : Technoscience Academy
PRINT ISSN : 2395-6011
ONLINE ISSN : 2395-602X
Cite This Article :
Issahaku Shirazu, Y. B Mensah, Cyril Schandorf, S. Y. Mensah, Alfred Owusu, "Comparison of Measured Values of CTDI and DPL with Standard Reference values of Different CT Scanners for dose Management", International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp.185-190 , January-February-2017
URL : http://ijsrst.com/IJSRST17319