Using of Sugar Beet Pulp By-Product in Farm Animals Feeding

Authors

  • A. A. M. Habeeb  Biological Applications Department, Radioisotopes Applications Division, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Inshas, Cairo, Egypt
  • A. E. Gad  Biological Applications Department, Radioisotopes Applications Division, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Inshas, Cairo, Egypt
  • A. A. EL-Tarabany  Biological Applications Department, Radioisotopes Applications Division, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Inshas, Cairo, Egypt
  • M. M. Mustafa  Biological Applications Department, Radioisotopes Applications Division, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Inshas, Cairo, Egypt
  • M. A. A. Atta  Biological Applications Department, Radioisotopes Applications Division, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Inshas, Cairo, Egypt

Keywords:

Sugar Beets, Animal Feeding, Growth, Blood Composition, Milk Yield And Composition.

Abstract

Sugar beet pulp is a by-product from the processing of sugar beets into sugar. Beet pulp is extracted grounded sugar beet. It is used as livestock feed and it can be fed fresh, dried and ensiled (fermented beet pulp). Sugar beet pulp is a by-product from the processing of sugar beet which is used as fodder for cattle and other livestock. It is supplied either as dried flakes or as compressed pellets. Sugar beet pulp is a highly palatable feed with good energy levels. Sugar beet pulp is low in sugar and other non-structural carbohydrates. Contains highly digestible fibre which is suited to ruminants as it maintains rumen condition and encourages acetate production. It has a high liquid absorbency and can, therefore, be used as a silage additive to retain the feed value from effluent. Another by-product from the processing of raw sugar cane is cane molasses. This is usually mixed with the sugar beet pulp to form molasses sugar beet when it is dried and pressed and distributed as shreds or pellets. The fibrous residues of sugar beet comprise mainly cellulose, which is highly digestible. Thus when fed with an appropriate supplement of degradable protein, sugar beet is an exceptionally suitable feed for ruminants, helping to promote optimum rumen conditions and boosting milk production. After the sugar has been extracted from sugar beets, the fibrous portion of the sugar beet is dehydrated. Dried beet pulp shreds have a very low bulk density so are often processed into pellets or cubes for transport. Both shreds and pelleted /cubed beet pulp is used in animals feed. Despite being called sugar beet pulp, beet pulp contributes very little sugar to the diet. Beet pulp, which commonly is used in beef cattle diets as a supplement or roughage replacement in finishing diets, is the beet shreds left over from processing. This feed is high in energy and fiber. Beet pulp is supplied either as dried flakes or as compressed pellets. Despite being a byproduct of sugar beet processing, beet pulp itself is low in sugar and other non structural carbohydrates, but high in energy and fiber and contains 0.8 % calcium and 0.5 % phosphorus.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations. (2010). FAO STAT: Countries by commodity, Select Countries by Commodity then select "Sugar Beet" from the drop down menu.
  2. United States Department of Agriculture (2011). "Sugar: World Markets and Trade". FAS Information.
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations. (2009). "Agribusiness  Handbook: Sugar beet white sugar".
  4. Agriculture Economic and Statistics Institute (2009).  Ministry of Agriculture, Agric., Economics, Part 1. Publ. By Agric. Res. Center, Egypt.
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations. (2011). "FAOSTAT: Production, Crops, Sugar beet, 2010 data"..
  6. Lardy, G. and R. Schafer (2013). Feeding sugar beet byproduct to cattle. North Dakota State University and South Dakota State University http:// www .progressivecattle.com/focus-topics/nutrition
  7. Micard, V. , J.H. Grabber, J. Ralph, C.M.G.C. Renard and J.F. Thibault (1997). Dehydrodiferulic acids from sugar-beet pulp. Phytochemistry,  44, :1365-1368.
  8. Mustafa, M. M. M.; H. M. Saleh and H. A. EL-Fouly (2009). Effect of olive by-product inclusion in lambs diet on productive performance and some blood parameters. Egyptian J. Nutr. And Feeds, 12(3) special Issue: 253-262.
  9. Mustafa, M.M.M. (2011). Effect of dried olive oil By-Product supplementation to Ration on  the Performance of Local Ewes and Their Lambs. Isotope & RAD.RES.,40(4) (suppl. 1),507-518.
  10. Lardy G and Schafer R (2008). Feeding sugar beet byproducts to cattle. AS-1365, NDSU. Extension Service, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105.
  11. Larrauri, J.A. (1999). New approaches in the preparation of high dietary fiber powders from fruit by-products, Trends in Food Sci. Technol., 10: 3.
  12. El-Badawi, A.Y., M.H.M. Yacout and H.E.M. Kamel, (2003). Effect of replacing corn with sugar beet pulp on ruminal degradation kinetics and utilization efficiency of rations by growing sheep. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 6: 1349–1363.
  13. El-Badawi, A.Y. and R.I. El-Kady (2006). Effect of partial replacement of concentrates with sugar beet pulp on performance, carcass characteristics and energy utilization of growing sheep. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 8 (3): 344-348.
  14. Omer H.A.A, Soha S. Abdel-Magid, A. Y. El-Badawi, I. M. Awadalla, M. I. Mohamed and Mona S. Zaki (2013). Nutritional Impact for the Whole Replacement of Concentrate Feed Mixture by Dried Sugar Beet Pulp on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Ossimi Sheep. Life Science Journal;10(4)|1987-1999.
  15. Filipovic, N., Djuric, M., and Gyura, J (2007): The effect of the type and quantity of sugar-beet fibers on bread characteristics, J. Food Eng., 78, 1047.
  16. 6Özboy, O. Sahbaz, F. and Koksel, H (1998): Chemical and physical characterization of sugar beet fiber, Acta Alimentaria, 27, 137.
  17. 7Levigne, S., Ralet, M. C., and Thibault, J. F. (2002). Characterization of pectins extracted from fresh sugar beet under different conditions using an experimental design, Carbohydr. Polymers, 49: 145.
  18. Fares, K (2003). Extraction and degradation of polysaccharides from sugar beets under factory conditions, Zuckerind., 128, 243.
  19. Castle, M.E.; M.S. Gill and J.N. Watson (1981). Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried sugar beet pulp as silage supplements. Grass and Forage Sci., 36:319-324.
  20. Mahmoud S.A., G. El-Santiel and M.F. Ali (1998). Dried sugar beet pulp as a grain replacement in sheep ration J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ. 24:118.
  21. Haaksma, J. (1993). Sugar beet pulp in diets for dairy cows. Mededeling Institute voor Rationele Suiker produktie, 27:46.
  22. Kjaergaard, L. (1984). Examples of bio-technological utilization of beet pulp and bagasse. Sugar Technol. Rev. 10:183.
  23. Metwally, H.M. and M.D. Stern (1989). Effects of dietary carbohydrates and protein sources on ruminal fermentation and protein supply to the small intestine of dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 66:95.
  24. Mandebvue, P. and Galbraith (1999). Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation and variation in the proportion of barley and sugar beet pulp on growth performance and rumen, blood and carcass characteristics of young male lambs. Anim. Feed. Sci. and Technol.
  25. Bhattacharya, A.N. and F.T. Sleiman (1971). Beet pulp as grain replacement for dairy cows and sheep. J. Dairy Sci., 54:89-94.
  26. Mostafa M. R. M.; R. Salama; M. E. Lashin and A. A. Abodo (2003).Utilization of olive cake in fattening rations of Rhmani lambs. Egyptian J. Nutr. And Feeds 6(special Issue):811-820.
  27. Bendary, M.M., A.M. Mahmoud, I.S. Koriet, E.M. Abdel-Raouf and S.A. Awadalla (1992). Nutritional studies on using sugar beet tops in animal feeding-Minerals content of different varieties of sugar beet tops and sume minerals balances. Vet. Med. J., 10: 89-99.
  28. Saleh, M.S., N.M. Eweedah, M.F. Ali and M.K. Mohsen (2001). Comparison between dried sugar beet pulp and yellow corn as a source of energy with berseem in rations of growing lambs. Egypt. J. Nutrition and Feeds, 4 (special issue): 231.
  29. Ministry of Agriculture and food (2008). Sugar Beets as a Feed Ingredient Ontario, Canada,
  30. Mohsen, M.K.; M.F. Ali and M.L. Bassiouni (1999). The effect of partial replacing concentrate mixture by dried sugar beet pulp on performance of growing Angora goats. Proceeding the 7th scientific conference of Animal Nutrition. 19-21 October,309-318.
  31. El-Ashry, M.A., Zeba A. Motagally and Y.A. Maareck (2000). Effect of dried sugar beet pulp in dairy Buffalo rations on colostrum, milk yield and composition Egyptian J. Nutrition and feeds 3(1):15-22.
  32. Maareck, Y.A. (1997). Effect of feeding some by-products on the performance of dairy buffalo. Ph.D. Thesis in Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University, Shoubra El-Kheima, Cairo, Egypt.
  33. Gaivoronskii, B.A. (1980). Tubers in diets for cows. Referativenyi Zhurnal 58:12 Nutr. Abst. Rev., 52:768.
  34. Bhattacharya, A.N. and W.F. Lubbadah (1971). Feeding high levels of beet pulp in high concentrate dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci., 54:95.
  35. Kelly,  P. (1983). Sugar beet pulp. A review. Anim. Feed. Sci., Technal. 8:1.
  36. Eweedah, N.M. (2001). Dried sugar beet pulp as a source of energy in sheep rations. Egypt. J. Nutrition and Feeds. 4 (Special Issue): 241.
  37. Mansfield, H.R., M.D. Stern and D.E. Otterby (1994). Effects of beet pulp and animal by-products on milk yield and in-vitro fermentation by rumen microorganisms. J. Dairy Sci., 77:205.
  38. Castle, M.E. (1972). A comparative study of the feeding value of dried sugar beet pulp for milk production. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 78:371-377.
  39. Boucque, Ch.V.,   B.G. Cottyn, J.V. Aerts and F.X. Buysse (1976). Dried sugar beet pulp as a high energy feed for beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1(4): 643-653.
  40. Leontowiez, H., H. Leontowiez, P. Krzeminski, G. Kulasek, E. Sobcxzak and J. Hempel-Zawitkowsks (1989). Physiological evaluation of the utility of condensed beet molasses solubles in ruminant feeding. 4-Apparent digestibility of the major ration and nitrogen balance in wethers fed beet molasses solubles. Prace J. Materialy Zootechniczn 33:53.
  41. Ali, M.F., K. Mohsen, M.I. Bassiouni and M.M.E. Khalafalla (2000). The influence of using dried sugar beet pulp on sheep performance. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 26: 132
  42. Masuda, Y., S. Kondo, M. Shimojo and L. Goto (1999). Effect of sugar beet pulp supplementation on fiber degradation of grass hay in the rumen of goats. Asian Australasian J. Anim. Sci., 12:186.
  43. Iconomou, D.K., Kandylis, C. Israilids and P. Nikokyris (1997). Protein enhancement of sugar beet pulp by fermentation and estimation of protein degradability in the rumen of sheep. Small Ruminant Research. 27:55.
  44. Mousa, M. R. M. (2011). Effect of partial replacement of dietary concentrate feed mixture by fodder beet roots on productive performance of ewes and doe goats under the conditions of  North Sinai. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 5 (4):228-242.
  45. Kamatali P, Teller E, Vangelle M, Collignon G and Foulon M (1992). In situ degradability of organic matter, crude protein and cell wall of various tree forages. Anim Prod 55: 29–34
  46. Ali, M.F. (1996). The use of treated and untreated sugar beet by-products in feeding farm animals. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ., Egypt.
  47. O’Mara, FP, GK Stakelum, P Dillon, JJ Murphy, M  Rath (1997). Rumen fermentation and nutrient flows for cows fed grass and grass supplemented with molassed beet pulp pellets J. Dairy Sci., 80 (10):2466-2474.
  48. Rouzbehan, Y., H. Galbraith, J.A. Rooke and J.G. Perrott (1994). A note on the effects of dietary inclusion of a yeast culture on growth and ruminal metabolism of lambs given diets containing unground pelleted molassed dried sugar-beet pulp and barley in various pro-portions. Anim. Prod. 59, 147–150.
  49. Molina Alcaide, E., Yanez Ruiz, D.R., Moumen, A., Martin Garcıa, A.I (2003a). Ruminal degradability and invitro intestinal digestibility of sunflower meal and in vitro digestibility of olive by-products supplemented with urea or sunflower meal comparison between goats and sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 110, 3–15.
  50. Molina Alcaide E., Yanez Ruiz D.R, Moumen A., and Martin Garcia AI (2003b). Chemical composition and nitrogen availability for goats and sheep of some olive by products. Small  Rumin. Res., 49, 329-336.
  51. Boucque, Ch.V.,   B.G. Cottyn, J.V. Aerts and F.X. Buysse (1976). Dried sugar beet pulp as a high energy feed for beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1(4): 643-653.
  52. Gihad, EA, AS Shalaby, GM Abdul-Aziz, OAI Salem and H.M. El-Banna (1989). Nutritional studies on sugar beet pulp with small ruminants. 2. Effect on the performance of growing lambs. Agris. FAO Organization.
  53. Bhattacharya, A.N., T.M. Khan and M. Uwayjan (1975). Dried beet pulp as a sole source of energy in beef and sheep rations. J. Anim. Sci., 41:616.
  54. El-Badawi, A.Y., R.I. El-Kady, T.M. El-Bedawy and M.Z.Sedik, (2001). Inclusion of sugar beet pulp in ruminant diets. 2. Changes of rumen fermentation, microbial count and enzymatic activity associated with feeding different levels of ureated sugar beet pulp in rations of growing sheep. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 4: 113–24
  55. Bauer, M.L., Schimek, D.E., Reed, J.J., Caton, P.T., Berg, P.T. and Lardy, G.P. (2007).  Influence of pressed beet pulp and concentrated separator by-product on intake, gain, efficiency of gain, and carcass composition of growing and finishing beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 2290-2297.
  56. Murphy, J. J. (1985). Effect of feeding sodium bicarbonate in the concentrate or beet pulp on milk yield and composition in cows after turnout to pasture in spring. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research, 24, No. 2/3 :143-149
  57. Beauchemin, K.A., B.I. Farr and L.M. Rode (1991). Enhancement of the effective fiber content of barley-based concentrates fed to dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3128-3139.
  58. El-Fouly, H.A., S.M. Abdel-Baki, M.E. Nowar, and M.M. Mostafa (2004). Formulating of rations contained dried sugar beet pulp for milking ewes and their lambs. Zagazig J. Agric. 31(4B):1769-1784.
  59. Lebzien P., R. Daenicke and K. Rohr (1992). Untersuchungen über den Einfluß verseifter Pflanzenfettsäuren auf die Milchleistung und die Milchinhaltsstoffe. Landbauforschung Völkenrode, 42, 85-88.
  60. Petit, H.V. and Tremblay G.F.(1995a). Milk production and intake of lactating cows fed grass silage with protein and energy supplements. J Dairy Sci.,78(2):353-361.
  61. Petit, H.V. and Tremblay G.F.(1995b). Ruminal fermentation and digestion in lactating cows fed grass silage with protein and energy supplements. J Dairy Sci., 78(2):342-352.
  62. Huhtanen, P. (1988). The effect of dietary inclusion of barley, unmolassed sugar beet pulp and molasses on milk production, digestibility and digesta passage in dairy cows given silage based diet. Dept. Animal Husbandry, Helsinki Univ., Finland.
  63. Valk, H., H. W. Klein Poelhuis, and H. J. Wentick. (1990). Effect of fibrous and startchy carbohydrates in concentrates as supplements in herbage-based diet for high yielding dairy cows. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38:475-486.
  64. Eweedah, N.M., S.A. Mahmoud, G. El-Santiel and M.F. Ali (1999). Utilization of sugar beet by-products in feeding ruminants. 1- Digestibility, rumen fermentation and nutritive value. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 1: 121–130.
  65. Belibasakis, N.G., Tsirgogianni, D (1996): Effects of dried citrus pulp on milk yield, milk composition and blood components of dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 60, 87–92.
  66. Hemingway, R.G., J.J. Parkins and J. Fraser (1986). Sugar beet pulp products for dairy cows. Animal Feed Sci. and Technology,15 (2):123-127.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
A. A. M. Habeeb, A. E. Gad, A. A. EL-Tarabany, M. M. Mustafa, M. A. A. Atta, " Using of Sugar Beet Pulp By-Product in Farm Animals Feeding, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp.107-120, May-June-2017.