Comparative Performance Analysis of Cryogenic Treated Carbide Tools

Authors

  • Sameem Ahmed  ME Student , Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teacher, Training and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • P S Rao   Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teacher, Training and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • Sukhdev Singh  Assistant Professor, H.O.D Production & Industrial Egg. CCET Sector-26 Chandigarh, India

Keywords:

Analysis, with Cryogenic and uncryogenic treatment carbide tools, Tool wear.

Abstract

Tool wear became important issue for industries for sustainable manufacturing. Tool life became improve by using method such as optimal cutting condition, cutting fluid, coatings and heating process. Another method tool life became improvement such as cryogenic treatment .Metal cutting operation it became necessary to reduce tool wear and improve the product quality. A comparative investigation of the Tool wear behaviour of with cryogenically tungsten carbide inserts and without cryogenically tungsten carbide inserts in dry machining. The tungsten carbide inserts square-shaped and cryogenic has done at ?196 °C. Experimental has designed by Taguchi's L9 orthogonal array. ANOVA analysis machining parameters has affected on the tool wear. The analyzed result was using ANOVA and signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and with cryogenic tungsten carbide inserts better result compared to that without uncryogenic tungsten carbide inserts in machining conditions .In cryogenic Cutting speed has maximum affected on tool wear .

References

  1. Prajwalkumar M. Patil , Rajendrakumar V. Kadi , Dr. Suresh T. Dundur,Anil S. Pol ,"Effect of Cutting Parameters on Surface Quality of AISI 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel in CNC Turning", International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol .2,2015,pp.1453-1460.
  2. M.Narasimha,R.ReijiKumar,Achamyelehaemro Kassie ,"Performance of Coated Carbide Tools", The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, Vol .2, 2013, pp.47-54.
  3. IhsanKorkut , Mustafa Kasap , Ibrahim Ciftci, UlviSeker, "Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel", Materials and Design,Vol 25, 2004; pp. 303-305.
  4. IlhanAsilturk, SuleymanNeseli, "Multi response optimization of CNC turning parameters via Taguchi method-based response surface analysis", Measurement ,Vol.45, 2012; pp. 785-794.
  5. P. Marimuthu and K. Chandrasekaran," Experimental Study On Stainless Steel For Optimal Setting Of Machining Parameters Using Taguchi And Neural Network", ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6,2011, pp.119-127.
  6. P. Marimuthu and K. Chandrasekaran," Experimental Study On Stainless Steel For Optimal Setting Of Machining Parameters Using Taguchi And Neural Network", ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6,2011, pp.119-127.
  7. R. Suresh,S. Basavarajappa and G.L. Samuel," Some studies on hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using multilayer coated carbide tool",journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/measurement, Vol. 45,2012, pp.1872-1884.
  8. Ashok Kumar Sahoo and Bidyadhar Sahoo ,"Experimental investigations on machinability aspects in finish hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using uncoated and multilayer coated carbide inserts", journal homepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/measurement, Vol. 45,2012, pp.2153-2165.
  9. Murat Sar?kaya and Abdulkadir Gullu," Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL", journalhomepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro, Vol. 46,2014, pp.604-606.
  10. P. Marimuthu and K. Chandrasekaran, 2011," Experimental Study On Stainless Steel For Optimal Setting Of Machining Parameters Using Taguchi And Neural Network", ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6, pp.119-127.
  11. T.V.S. Reddy, B.S. Ajaykumar, M.V. Reddy and R. Venkataram,2007 ,"Improvement of tool life of cryogenically treated P-30 tools",Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Materials and Compositees (ICAMC-2007) at National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, CSIR, Trivandrum, India, pp. 457-460.
  12. A.Y.L. Yong, K.H.W. Seah, M. Rahman,2007 ," Performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in milling operations", Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.Vol 32 ,pp. 638-643.
  13. Vishal Sardana, Achintya, Ranganath M. S. 2016," Analysis Of Surface Roughness During CNC Turning Using Taguchi And Response Surface Methodology", IOSR Journal of Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 59-70.
  14. Muhammad Yasir, Turnad Lenggo Ginta, Bambang Ariwahjoedi,2016, Adam Umar Alkali, and Mohd Danish ,"Effect Of Cutting Speed And Feed Rate On Surface Roughness Of AISI 316l SS Using End-Milling", ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, pp. 2496-2500.
  15. Nursel Altan Ozbek , Adem Cicek , Mahmut Gulesin , Onur Ozbek,2014 ,"Investigation of the effects of cryogenic treatment applied at different holding times to cemented carbide inserts on tool wear", International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,Vol .86,pp.34-43.
  16. Z. Palmai, 1987" Cutting temperature in intermittent cutting", Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol .27 , pp.261-274.
  17. N.R. Dhar, S. Paul, M.B. Chattopadhyay,2001, "Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol.166 , pp. 44-48.
  18. S. S Gill,H. Singh, R.Singh,J.Singh,2011, "Flankwearandmachiningper formance of cryogenical lytreated tungstencar bideinserts", Mater. Manuf. Process.Vol.26 ,pp. 1430-1441.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Sameem Ahmed, P S Rao , Sukhdev Singh, " Comparative Performance Analysis of Cryogenic Treated Carbide Tools, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 3, Issue 7, pp.442-447, September-October-2017.