Filtration Textile Material For Waste Water Treatment Methods

Authors

  • D. Anita Rachel  Assistant Professor, Department of Apparel Manufacturing and Merchandising, NIFT - TEA College of Knitwear Fashion, Tirupur and Research scholar - Department of Rural Industries and Management, Gandhigram Rural Institute DeemedUniversity,Gandjigram, Dindigul, TamilNadu, India
  • N. Sriramm  B.Sc(AMM), Department of Apparel Manufacturing and Merchandising NIFT – Tea College of Knitwear Fashion, Tirupur, India
  • Dr. B. Senthilkumar  Assistant Professor Department of Rural Industries and Management, Gandhigram Rural Institute, India

Keywords:

Dynamic Membrane, Membrane Bioreactor, Biosorption, SFDM, UMFI, LPM, MF/UF,TFF

Abstract

Adsorption has been proved to be an excellent way to treat industrial waste effluents, offering significant advantages like the low-cost, availability, profitability, ease of operation and efficiency. Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions is a relatively new process that has proven very promising in the removal of contaminants from aqueous effluents. Biosorption is becoming a potential alternative to the existing technologies for the removal and/or recovery of toxic metals from wastewater. The major advantages of biosorption technology are its effectiveness in reducing the concentration of heavy metal ions to very low levels and the use of inexpensive biosorbent materials. Metal adsorption and biosorption onto agricultural wastes is a rather complex process affected by several factors. Mechanisms involved in the biosorption process include chemisorption, complexation, adsorption–complexation on surface and pores, ion exchange, microprecipitation, heavy metal hydroxide condensation onto the biosurface, and surface adsorptionThis paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the current status of dynamic membrane (DM) technology as an alternative to membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems. DM filtration makes use of a physical barrier (e.g. cloth or mesh) on which a cake layer is formed. It is already used in traditional filtration systems, but applications in biological wastewater treatment are still at its infancy. Dynamic filtration of sludge has lower risk of fouling and requires less energy and lower capital costs compared to MBR. A review of the state-of-art in both DM materials and configurations is presented. Factors affecting DM performance are discussed in order to determine the optimum and critical approaches for membrane operation. Future perspectives to enhance the applicability and functionality of the technology regarding the treatment and membrane performance are presented.

References

  1. Ahmed, Z., Cho, J., Lim, B.R., Song, K.G., Ahn, K.H., 2007. Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 287 (2), 211–218.
  2. Al-Malack, M.H., Anderson, G.K., 1996. Formation of dynamic membranes with crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 112, 287–296.
  3. Al-Malack, M.H., Anderson, G.K., 1997a. Crossflow microfiltration with dynamic membranes. Water Res. 31 (8), 1969–1979.
  4. Al-Malack, M.H., Anderson, G.K., 1997b. Cleaning techniques of dynamic membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 12, 25–33.
  5. Al-Malack, M.H., Anderson, G.K., Almasi, A., 1998. Treatment of anoxic pond effluent using crossflow microfiltration. Water Res. 32 (12), 3738–3746.
  6. Alavi Moghaddam, M.R., Satoh, H., Mino, T., 2002. Effect of important operational parameters on performance of coarse pore filtration activated sludge process.
  7. Water Sci. Technol. 46 (9), 229–236.
  8. An, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Yang, D., Zhou, Q., 2009. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 155, 709–715.
  9. Lee, J., Ahn, W.Y., Lee, C.H., 2001. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 35 (10), 2435–2445.
  10. Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Wei, T., Lu, F., Tong, J., Mai, S., 2011. Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem. 46, 1538–1544.
  11. Zhao, Y., Tan, Y., Wong, F.S., Fane, A.G., Xu, N., 2005. Formation of dynamic membranes for oily water separation by crossflow filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 44, 212–220.
  12. Zhao, Y., Tan, Y., Wong, F.S., Fane, A.G., Xu, N., 2006. Formation of Mg (OH) 2 dynamic membranes for oily water separation: effects of operating conditions. Desalination 191, 344–350.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
D. Anita Rachel, N. Sriramm, Dr. B. Senthilkumar, " Filtration Textile Material For Waste Water Treatment Methods, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp.1101-1108, January-February-2018.