Incubative Entrepreneurshipism and Financial exclusion Subjugation : Empirical Study from India

Authors

  • Dr. B. S. Hothi  Professor-Cum-Director, Gitarattan International Business School (GIBS), Delhi, India

Keywords:

Entrepreneurship Incubation, Financial Exclusionsubjugation

Abstract

This research paper explores the relationship between the entrepreneurship Incubation and economic growth, the research paper employed correlation research design. The overall sample consists of 80 respondents in India region. Thisresearch paper found weak positive relationship between entrepreneurship incubation and financial exclusionsubjugations. The Sig. or P-value was less enough, suggesting that the two variables indicated that the computed R-value was _0.195; this indicates that there was weak positive correlation between entrepreneurship incubation and financial exclusionsubjugation.

References

  1. Agricultural Fundamentalism.'Kyklos57, 253-264 Quibria, M.G. (2002) 'Growth andfinancial exclusion: Lessons from the East Asian Miracle.
  2. Birch, David L., 1979, the Job Generation Process: Final Report to Economic Incubation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change
  3. Bourguignon, François (2003) ‘The Growth Elasticity of Financial exclusionSubjugation; Explaining Heterogeneity Across Countries and Time Periods.' In Inequality and Growth:
  4. Brock, W. A., and D. S. Evans, 1989, "Small Business Economics," Small Business Economics 1, 7-20.
  5. Datt, Gaurav and Martin Ravallion (1998) 'Why Have Some Indian States Done Better than Others at Reducing Rural Financial exclusion?' Economica65, 17-38
  6. Dean, J. et al., 1996, "Business Networks: Growth Options Manufacturing and Service Sector Comparisions," in Gibson, B. et al., (eds.), Proceedings of the Join SEAANZ and IIE Small Enterprise Conference, Newcastle Australia: IIE University of Newcastle
  7. Dollar, David and AartKraay (2002) ‘Growth is Good for the Poor.' Journal of Economic Growth 7, 195-225
  8. Fan, Shenggen and NeethaRao (2003) ‘Public Spending in Developing Countries:Trends, Determination, and Impact.' EPTD Discussion Paper No. 99. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute
  9. Fan, Shenggen, Peter Hazell, and SukhadeoThorat (2000) ‘Government Spending Growth, and Financial exclusion in Rural India.' American Journal of Agricultural Economics82 (4), 1038-1051
  10. Hasan, R. and M.G. Quibria (2004) ‘Industry Matters for Financial exclusion: A Critique of
  11. Haveman, R. and J. Schwabish, 2000, "Has Macroeconomic Performance Regained Regained its Anti-Financial exclusion Bite?" Contemporary Economic Policy 18,415-427. Journal of Incubation Economics 80 (1), 198-227
  12. Karlsson, C. et al., 1993, "Regional characteristics, Business Dynamics and Economic Incubation," in Karlsson, C., B. Johannisson, and D. Storey (eds.), Small Business Dynamics: International, National and regional Perspectives, Perspectives, New York: Routledge.
  13. Kraay, Aart (2006) ‘When Is Growth Pro-Poor? Evidence from a Panel of Countries.'
  14. Loveman, G. and W. Sengenberger, 1991, "The Re-emergence of Small-Scale Production: An International Comparison," Small Business Economics, 3(1), 1-39.
  15. Metro and Non-metro America," Rural Incubation Research Report No74. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Economic Research Service.
  16. Miller, J., 1990, "Survival and Growth of Independent Firms and Corporate Affiliates in
  17. Narayan, Deepa, Robert Chambers, Meera K. Shah, and Patti Petesch (2000) Voicesof the Poor: Crying Out for Change. New York: Oxford University Press
  18. Pap,er, and Center for Advanced Small Business Economics, Erasmus University, and Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  19. Ravallion, Martin and GauravDatt (1996) ‘How Important to India's Poor Is the Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth?'World Bank Economic Review 10 (1), 1-25 Revisited.' Research Paper No. 33. Tokyo: Asian Incubation Bank Institute
  20. Suleiman, A.S (2006). The Business entrepreneur; Entrepreneurial Incubation small and Medium Enterprise, 2nd Edition. Entrepreneurship Academy PublishingKadunaDrucker, P. F. (1970). Technology, Management and Society. ButterworthHeinemann Ltd.
  21. Theory and Policy Implications. T. Eicher and S. Turnovsky (eds.) Cambridge: MIT Press
  22. Timmer, C. Peter (1997) ‘How Well do the Poor Connect to the Growth Process.' CAER Discussion Paper No. 178. Cambridge MA: Harvard Institute for International Incubation
  23. U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), 1998, The State of Small Business: A Report of the President, Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-27

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. B. S. Hothi, " Incubative Entrepreneurshipism and Financial exclusion Subjugation : Empirical Study from India, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp.1821-1828, January-February-2018.