Predicting Brain Age using Machine Learning Algorithms : A Comprehensive Evaluation

Authors

  • M Vineela  Associate Professor, Department of CSE, Bhoj Reddy Engineering College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Thota Prathyusha  Student, Department of CSE, Bhoj Reddy Engineering College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Ette Pravalika  Student, Department of CSE, Bhoj Reddy Engineering College for Women, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Keywords:

Structural MRI, Neuroimaging, Brain Age, Machine Learning, Ensemble Deep Learning, Regularization

Abstract

Brain age is an imaging-based biomarker with excellent feasibility for characterizing individual brain health and may serve as a single quantitative index for clinical and domain-specific usage. Brain age has been successfully estimated using extensive neuroimaging data from healthy participants with various feature extraction and conventional machine learning (ML) approaches. Recently, several end-to-end deep learning (DL) analytical frameworks have been proposed as alternative approaches to predict individual brain age with higher accuracy. However, the optimal approach to select and assemble appropriate input feature sets for DL analytical frameworks remains to be determined. In the Predictive Analytics Competition 2019, we proposed a hierarchical analytical framework which first used ML algorithms to investigate the potential contribution of different input features for predicting individual brain age. The obtained information then served as a priori knowledge for determining the input feature sets of the final ensemble DL prediction model. Systematic evaluation revealed that ML approaches with multiple concurrent input features, including tissue volume and density, achieved higher prediction accuracy when compared with approaches with a single input feature set [Ridge regression: mean absolute error (MAE) = 4.51 years, R2 = 0.88; support vector regression, MAE = 4.42 years, R2 = 0.88]. Based on this evaluation, a final ensemble DL brain age prediction model integrating multiple feature sets was constructed with reasonable computation capacity and achieved higher prediction accuracy when compared with ML approaches in the training dataset (MAE = 3.77 years; R2 = 0.90). Furthermore, the proposed ensemble DL brain age prediction model also demonstrated sufficient generalizability in the testing dataset (MAE = 3.33 years). In summary, this study provides initial evidence of how-to efficiency for integrating ML and advanced DL approaches into a unified analytical framework for predicting individual brain age with higher accuracy. With the increase in large open multiple-modality neuroimaging datasets, ensemble DL strategies with appropriate input feature sets serve as a candidate approach for predicting individual brain age in the future.

References

  1. T. Vos, A. D. Flaxman, M. Naghavi, R. Lozano, C. Michaud, M. Ezzati, K. Shibuya, J. A. Salomon, S. Abdalla, V. Aboyans et al., “Years lived with disability (ylds) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010,” The Lancet, vol.380, no. 9859, pp. 2163–2196, 2012.
  2. K. Franke and C. Gaser, “Ten years of BrainAGE as a neuroimaging biomarker of brain aging: what insights have we gained?” Frontiers in Neurology, p. 789, 2019.
  3. M. Cearns, T. Hahn, and B. T. Baune, “Recommendations and future directions for supervised machine learning in psychiatry,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.
  4. E. Luders, N. Cherbuin, and C. Gaser, “Estimating brain age using high-resolution pattern recognition: Younger brains in long-term meditation practitioners,” NeuroImage, vol. 134, pp. 508–513, 2016.
  5. S. Mishra, I. Beheshti, and P. Khanna, “A review of neuroimaging-driven brain age estimation for identification of brain disorders and health conditions,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering,2021.
  6. D. Sone, I. Beheshti, S. Shinagawa, H. Niimura, N. Kobayashi, H. Kida, R. Shikimoto, Y. Noda,S. Nakajima, and S. Bun, “Neuroimaging-derived brain age is associated with life satisfaction in cog nitively unimpaired elderly: A community-based study,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp.1–6, 2022.
  7. L. Zhang, M. Wang, M. Liu, and D. Zhang, “A survey on deep learning for neuroimaging-based brain disorder analysis,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, p. 779, 2020.
  8. H. Sajedi and N. Pardakhti, “Age prediction based on brain MRI image: a survey,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1–30, 2019.
  9. L. Baecker, R. Garcia-Dias, S. Vieira, C. Scarpazza, and A. Mechelli, “Machine learning for brain age prediction: Introduction to methods and clinical applications,” EBioMedicine, vol. 72, p. 103600, 2021.
  10. M. Tanveer, B. Richhariya, R. Khan, A. Rashid, P. Khanna, M. Prasad, and C. Lin, “Machine learning techniques for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: A review,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), vol. 16, no. 1s, pp. 1–35, 2020.
  11. M. Tanveer, A. H. Rashid, R. Kumar, and R. Balasubramanian, “Parkinson’s disease diagnosis us ing neural networks: Survey and comprehensive evaluation,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 59, no. 3, p. 102909, 2022.
  12. K. Muhammad, S. Khan, J. Del Ser, and V. H. C. De Albuquerque, “Deep learning for multigrade brain tumor classification in smart healthcare systems: A prospective survey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 507–522, 2020.
  13. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
  14. F. Emmert-Streib, Z. Yang, H. Feng, S. Tripathi, and M. Dehmer, “An introductory review of deep learning for prediction models with big data,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, p. 4, 2020.
  15. M. d. Condorcet, “Essay on the application of analysis to the probability of majority decisions,” Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1785.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
M Vineela, Thota Prathyusha, Ette Pravalika "Predicting Brain Age using Machine Learning Algorithms : A Comprehensive Evaluation" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 10, Issue 4, pp.67-74, July-August-2023.