Comparison and Analysis of Liver Cancer Prediction Using ML
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST52310216Keywords:
Machine Learning, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest.Abstract
In diagnosis centers the importance of detecting a cancer on time is vital. With the help of tools like x-ray, MRI machine, medical professionals can detect somatic mutations easily (a somatic mutation is an acquired change in a genetic code of one or more cells). Here we chose a disease that is liver cancer. This deployed model is given data via google Collab, then analyzed in real-time with machine learning model which was pretrained and the result is shown in the google Collab. Models that are used in our project are Logistic regression, Naive Bayes classifier and Random Forest etc., is used to carry out computation for prediction. And we compare these machine learning models accuracies. But we got good accuracy for machine learning model (random forest classifier). Early detection can help in identifying the risk of liver cancer. Our model is helpful for doctors to give timely medications for treatment.
References
- J. L. Scully, ‘‘What is a disease?’’ EMBO Rep., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 650–653, 2004.
- R. Leaman, R. Islamaj Dogan, and Z. Lu, ‘‘DNorm: Disease name normalization with pairwise learning to rank,’’ Bioinformatics, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 2909–2917, Nov. 2013.
- N. Armstrong and P. Hilton, ‘‘Doing diagnosis: Whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility,’’ Social Sci. Med., vol. 120, pp. 208–214, Nov. 2014.
- A.-L. Bar abasi, N. Gulbahce, and J. Loscalzo, ‘‘Network medicine: A network-based approach to human disease,’’ Nature Rev. Genet., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–68, Jan. 2011.
- R. H. Scheuermann, W. Ceusters, and B. Smith, ‘‘Toward an ontological treatment of disease and diagnosis,’’ Summit Transl. Bioinformat., vol. 2009, p. 116, Mar. 2009.
- P. Croft, D. G. Altman, and J. J. Deeks, ‘‘The science of clinical practice: Disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about ‘what is likely to happen’ should shape clinical practice,’’ BMC Med., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 20, 2015.
- E. Choi, M. T. Bahadori, A. Schuetz, W. F. Stewart, and J. Sun, ‘‘Doctor ai: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks,’’ in Proc. Mach. Learn. Healthcare Conf., 2016, pp. 301–318.
- C. C. Lee, ‘‘Fuzzy logic in control systems: Fuzzy logic controller. I,’’IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 404–418, Mar./Apr. 1990.
- J. Yen and R. Langari, Fuzzy Logic: Intelligence, Control, and Information, vol. 1. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1999.
- H. D. Beale, H. B. Demuth, and M. Hagan, Neural Network Design. Boston, MA, USA: PWS, 1996.
- C.-H. Weng, T. C.-K. Huang, and R.-P. Han, ‘‘Disease prediction with different types of neural network classifiers,’’ Telematics Inform., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 277–292, 2016.
- K. Sumeet, J.J. Larson, B. Yawn, T.M. Therneau, W.R. Kim, Underestimation of liver-related mortality in the United States. Gastroenterology;(2013) 145:375–382, e371–372.
- A.A. Mokdad, A.D. Lopez, S. Shahraz, R. Lozano, A.H. Mokdad, J. Stanaway, et al, Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. BMC Med 2014; 12:145.
- Byass, Peter, The global burden of liver disease: a challenge for methods and for public health. BMC medicine 12.1 (2014); 159.
- L. A. Auxilia, Accuracy Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques for Indian Patient Liver Disease. 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI). IEEE (2018).
- Hashem, M. Esraa, S. Mai, A study of support vector machine algorithm for liver disease diagnosis. American Journal of Intelligent Systems 4.1 (2014); 9-14.
- P. Sajda, "Machine learning for detection and diagnosis of disease." Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 8 (2006); 537-565.
- UCI Machine Learning Repository. ILPD (Indian Liver Patient Dataset) Data Set. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/ILPD+(Indian+Liver+Patient+Dataset)
- Logistic Regression, retrieve from: HTTPS://WWW.SAEDSAYAD.COM/LOGISTIC_REGRESSION.HTM, LAST Accessed: 5 Octobor,2019
- L. Breiman, Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), (2001); 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
- Decision Trees, retrieve from: https://dataaspirant.com/2017/01/30/how-decision-tree-algorithm-works/, Last Accessed: 5 Octobor,2019
- Support vector machine, retrieve from: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/support-vector-machines, Last Accessed: 5 Octobor,2019
- V. Vapnik, I. Guyon, T. H.-M, Learn, and undefined 1995. Support vector machines. statweb.stanford.edu (1995).
- Zhang M, Zhou Z, "ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning." Pattern recognition40.7:(2007); 2038-2048.
- G. Guo, H. Wang, D. Bell, Y. Bi, K. Greer, KNN Model-Based Approach in Classification (pp. 986–996). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_62
- Naive Bayes, retrieve from: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/naive-bayes-classifiers/, Last Accessed: 5 Octobor,2019
- S. M. Mahmud, et al. "Machine Learning Based Unified Framework for Diabetes Prediction." Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Big Data Engineering and Technology. ACM (2018).
- S. Safavian, D. Landgrebe, A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 21(3), (1991); 660-674.
- A. Chervonenkis, Early history of support vector machines. In Empirical Inference (pp. 13-20). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013).
- K.M. Leung, Naive bayesian classifier. Polytechnic University Department of Computer Science/Finance and Risk Engineering (2007).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRST

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.