Evaluation of Students Approach towards Reading Skills by Assessing the Quality of their Learning Outcomes
Keywords:
Deep Approach, Reading Skills, Surface ApproachAbstract
In the previous decades scientists found a shared connection between an understudy's academic reading skills and academic success. Understudies and also instructors, be that as it may, underestimate the learning of this aptitude. Subsequently, most understudies utilize a surface approach to reading in reading academic reading materials. This paper will talk about the need of educators to instruct the correct reading methodologies to enable understudies to utilize a deep approach in reading academic writings. Members of this exploration consider were taken from first-year college course. The target of the examination is to assess understudies approach to reading by surveying the quality of their learning outcomes.
References
- Aldisert, R. J, Clowney, S., & Peterson, J.D. (2007). Logic for law students: How to think like a lawyer. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 69(1), 1-22. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.
- Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (2000). The university of learning. London: Kogan Page.
- Carlino, F. (1999). Evaluación educacional: Historia, problemas. Buenos Aires: Aique.
- Erickson, B. L., Peters, C. B., & Strommer, D. W. (2006). Teaching first-year college students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Forsaith, D. (2001). Introducing assessment-based learning to a commerce topic flinders. University, Research Papers Series. Available online at: http://www.flinders.edu.au/socsci/index.cfm?6C53293F-CB74-C9FB- 9FBE- CB0AD332A237.
- Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown, & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment Matters in Higher Education, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Buckingham, UK: Herteis, E.
- Herteis, E. M. (2007). Content conundrums. PAIDEIA: Teaching and Learning at Mount Allison University, 3(1), 2-7.
- Hunt, R. A. (2004). Reading and writing for real: Why it matters for learning. Atlantic Universities’ Teaching Showcase, 55, 137-146.
- Knapper, C. (1995). Understanding student learning: Implications for instructional practice. In A. Wright & Associates (Eds.), Teaching Improvement Practices. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
- Marshall, P. (1974). How much, how often? College and Research Libraries, 35(6), 453-456.
- Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning I and II–Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRST
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
