Entrepreneur Network Behavior as the Gamechanger for Venture Performance : the Mediation Effect of Social Capital and Tacit Knowledge

Authors

  • Isaac Gumah Akolgo  Department of Business Administration, School of Management, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
  • Cai Li  Department of Business Administration, School of Management, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
  • Peter Yao Lartey  Department of Business Administration, School of Management, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
  • Kankam William Adomako  Department of Business Administration, School of Management, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P.R. China.

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRST207287

Keywords:

Entrepreneur, Network Behaviour, Social Capital, Tacit Knowledge, Venture Performance

Abstract

The individual characteristics continue to set apart who a successful or failed entrepreneurs and business ventures are in the business environment. The study therefore sought to investigate network behavior mechanism as a gamechanger for venture performance; the mediation effect of social capital and tacit knowledge. Entrepreneurs here were regarded as individuals who created their businesses and therefore respondents other than owners were not included in the study population. In total, 530 entrepreneurs were selected from three cities in Jiangsu Province. Purposive, convenient and simple random sampling techniques were applied in choosing the respondents. 410 completed questionnaires were retrieved. The results show that entrepreneurs engaging in network building attitude, network maintenance and network orientation determined their network behaviour. Network behaviour then positively and directly influences venture performance. This effect was significant showing that any effort or activities that lead to network behavior wield a corresponding effect on startups business performance. The results indicated that social capital mediated the relationship such that entrepreneur network behavior indirectly influences venture performance. Tacit knowledge acquisition was shown to boosts network behaviour effect on venture performance. This study departs from the psychological perspective which mainly focus on stable features of the entrepreneur to include the behaviour mechanisms hence makes the study central to better understand the entrepreneurial behavior and performance relationships.

References

  1. AMEH, A. A. & UDU, A. A. 2016. Social networks and entrepreneurship orientation among students in nigerian universities: a study of social network size and risk disposition. Business and Management Research, 5, 1-11.
  2. BARTOL, K. M. & SRIVASTAVA, A. 2002. Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 64-76.
  3. BAUMOL, W. J. 2007. Entrepreneurship and innovation: The (Micro) theory of price and profit. File: Entpricetheory-w-apr-4-2007.
  4. BRAUNERHJELM, P. 2011. Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: interdependencies, irregularities and regularities. Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Elgar: Cheltenham, 161-213.
  5. CASCIARO, T., GINO, F. & KOUCHAKI, M. 2016. Learn to love networking. Harvard Business Review, 94, 104-107.
  6. DE BRUIN, A., BRUSH, C. G. & WELTER, F. 2007. Advancing a framework for coherent research on women's entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31, 323-339.
  7. DE CAROLIS, D. M. L., BARRIE E, EDDLESTON, KIMBERLY A 2009. Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 527-545.
  8. DUFAYS, F. & HUYBRECHTS, B. 2014. Connecting the dots for social value: A review on social networks and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5, 214-237.
  9. EDDLESTON, K. A., LADGE, J. J., MITTENESS, C. & BALACHANDRA, L. 2016. Do you see what I see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 40, 489-514.
  10. GARTNER, W. B. 1988. “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American journal of small business, 12, 11-32.
  11. GEENEN, N. Y., URBIG, D., MUEHLFELD, K., VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, A. & GARGALIANOU, V. 2016. BIS and BAS: Biobehaviorally rooted drivers of entrepreneurial intent. Personality Individual Differences. 95, 204-213.
  12. GIJU, G. C., BADEA, L., RUIZ, V. R. L. & PEÑA, D. N. 2010. Knowledge Management-the Key Resource in the Knowledge Economy. Theoretical Applied Economics, 17.
  13. GREBEL, T. 2005. Entrepreneurship: A new perspective, Routledge.
  14. HAFEEZ, K. & ABDELMEGUID, H. 2003. Dynamics of Human Resource and Knowledge Management. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 153-164.
  15. HAIR, J. F., RINGLE, C. M. & SARSTEDT, M. 2013. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance.
  16. HAIR JR, J. F., SARSTEDT, M., HOPKINS, L. & KUPPELWIESER, V. G. J. E. B. R. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
  17. HOANG, H. & ANTONCIC, B. 2003. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165-187.
  18. HOM, P. W. & XIAO, Z. 2011. Embedding social networks: How guanxi ties reinforce Chinese employees’ retention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 188-202.
  19. HOOGENDOORN, B., VAN DER ZWAN, P. & THURIK, R. J. J. O. B. E. 2019. Sustainable entrepreneurship: The role of perceived barriers and risk. 157, 1133-1154.
  20. IBARRA, H., KILDUFF, M. & TSAI, W. J. O. S. 2005. Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. 16, 359-371.
  21. JAVALGI, R. G., HALL, K. D. & CAVUSGIL, S. T. 2014. Corporate entrepreneurship, customer-oriented selling, absorptive capacity, and international sales performance in the international B2B setting: Conceptual framework and research propositions. International Business Review, 23, 1193-1202.
  22. KLOEPFER, K. & CASTROGIOVANNI, G. J. 2018. Entrepreneurship: venture creation subprocesses, subdomains, and interfaces. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 14, 681-696.
  23. KOGAN, L., PAPANIKOLAOU, D., SERU, A. & STOFFMAN, N. J. T. Q. J. O. E. 2017. Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. 132, 665-712.
  24. KYNDT, E. & BAERT, H. J. J. O. V. B. 2015. Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. 90, 13-25.
  25. LANIVICH, S. E. & PRACTICE 2015. The RICH entrepreneur: Using conservation of resources theory in contexts of uncertainty. Entrepreneurship Theory, 39, 863-894.
  26. LOEBBECKE, C., VAN FENEMA, P. C. & POWELL, P. J. T. J. O. S. I. S. 2016. Managing inter-organizational knowledge sharing. 25, 4-14.
  27. MARSDEN, P. V. 2017. Interpersonal ties, social capital, and employer staffing practices. Social capital. Routledge.
  28. MAURER, I. & EBERS, M. 2006. Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262-292.
  29. MEMON, N. 2016. Entrepreneurship in the eyes of network science. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 935-943.
  30. MORRISON, A. 2006. A contextualisation of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
  31. NAHAPIET, J. & GHOSHAL, S. J. A. O. M. R. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. 23, 242-266.
  32. NJARAMBA, J., CHIGEZA, P. & WHITEHOUSE, H. 2015. financial literacy: the case of migrant African-Australian women entrepreneurs in the cairns region. Entrepreneurship Sustainability Issues, 3, 198-208.
  33. NONAKA, I., KODAMA, M., HIROSE, A. & KOHLBACHER, F. J. E. M. J. 2014. Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation–A new paradigm for organizational theory. 32, 137-146.
  34. PIERCY, N. F., KALEKA, A. & KATSIKEAS, C. S. 1998. Sources of competitive advantage in high performing exporting companies. Journal of World Business, 33, 378-393.
  35. POLANYI, M. T. 1966. 1966 The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  36. PREACHER, K. J. & HAYES, A. F. J. B. R. M. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. 40, 879-891.
  37. RYAN, S. D., ZHANG, X., PRYBUTOK, V. R. & SHARP, J. H. 2012. Leadership and knowledge management in an e-government environment. Administrative sciences, 2, 63-81.
  38. SEIDLER?DE ALWIS, R. & HARTMANN, E. 2008. The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of knowledge management.
  39. SEMRAU, T. & SIGMUND, S. 2012. Networking ability and the financial performance of new ventures: A mediation analysis among younger and more mature firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 335-354.
  40. SHU, R., REN, S. & ZHENG, Y. Build Network before use it: Entrepreneur Network Capability and Opportunity Discovery. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, 12928.
  41. SU, C., YANG, Z., ZHUANG, G., ZHOU, N. & DOU, W. 2009. Interpersonal influence as an alternative channel communication behavior in emerging markets: The case of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 668-689.
  42. SU, J., ZHAI, Q. & KARLSSON, T. 2017. Beyond red tape and fools: Institutional theory in entrepreneurship research, 1992–2014. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 505-531.
  43. TASKOV, N., BOSKOV, T., METODIJESKI, D. & FILIPOSKI, O. 2011. Enterpreneurship in tourism industry lead to business benefits.
  44. THOMPSON, B. 2003. Guidelines for authors reporting score reliability estimates. Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues, 91-102.
  45. VAN LAERE, K. J. J. O. W. L. 2003. Social networks as a source of competitive advantage for the firm.
  46. WEI, L.-Q. & LING, Y. J. J. O. B. R. 2015. CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: Evidence from China. 68, 1157-1165.
  47. WIKLUND, J., NIKOLAEV, B., SHIR, N., FOO, M.-D. & BRADLEY, S. 2019. Entrepreneurship and well-being: Past, present, and future. Elsevier.
  48. WONG, P. K., HO, Y. P. & AUTIO, E. 2005. Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small business economics, 24, 335-350.
  49. WU, L. & CHIU, M.-L. J. I. J. O. I. M. 2018. Examining supply chain collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives. 39, 5-19.
  50. XIE, Y., DU, Y.-F., BOADU, F. & SHI, X.-Y. J. S. 2018. Executives’ Assessments of Evolutionary and Leapfrog Modes: An Ambidexterity Explanation Logic. 10, 2893.
  51. YEUNG, H. W.-C. 2002. Entrepreneurship in international business: An institutional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 29-61.
  52. ZHENG, N., WEI, Y., ZHANG, Y. & YANG, J. J. I. B. R. 2016. In search of strategic assets through cross-border merger and acquisitions: Evidence from Chinese multinational enterprises in developed economies. 25, 177-186.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

Issue

Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April-2020

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRST

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Isaac Gumah Akolgo, Cai Li, Peter Yao Lartey, Kankam William Adomako, " Entrepreneur Network Behavior as the Gamechanger for Venture Performance : the Mediation Effect of Social Capital and Tacit Knowledge, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp.482-501, March-April-2020. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST207287