Health Implication of Physicochemical Properties of Sump Oil Polluted and Remediated Soil

Authors

  • Nwodu J. A  Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Imo State Polytechnic,Umuagwo, Nigeria
  • Nwachukwu N  Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Imo State Polytechnic,Umuagwo, Nigeria
  • Ibegbulem C. O  DepartmentofBiochemistry, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria
  • Iwueke A. V  DepartmentofBiochemistry, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria
  • Akumefula M. I  Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Imo State Polytechnic,Umuagwo, Nigeria
  • Chukwuemeka U. V  Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Imo State Polytechnic,Umuagwo, Nigeria
  • Ohueri E. O  Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Imo State Polytechnic,Umuagwo, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2183192

Keywords:

Remediation, Pollution, Sump Oil, House-Hold, Waste

Abstract

Physicochemical properties of sump oil polluted and remediated soil was studied. Five (5kg) of soil was polluted with different concentrations (00, 50, 150 and 300 ml) of sump oil. The physiochemical properties of these soils were analyzed before pollution and after pollution using standard analytical procedures.The result of physicochemical parameters of the unpolluted, polluted and treated soils showed significant (P≤0.05) increase which are as follows: organic carbon%: (0.97,1.69-2.15, 0.8-1.49 ) organic matter%: (1.68,2.92-3.71, 1.3-2.57 )Total exchangeable acidity (0.5, 1.2-1.4, 0.5-1.1)Total nitrogen contentmol/kg:(0.08, 0.14-0.18, 0.06-0.12),Cataion exchange capacity(3.14, 4.18-5.17, 3.78-5.76) Calcium contentmol/kg:(1.2, 1.6-2.6, 1.4-2.6),Potassiummol/kg:( 0.18,0.18-0.22, 0.17-0.26) show significant (P≤0.05) decrease for PH:( 5.65, 4.11-4.31,5.67- 7.2) and magnesium mol/kg: (5.25,1.86-2.66, 4.26-7.63) The study concluded that sump oil pollution significantly changes the physicochemical properties of the soil and hence impacts it negatively. Treatment with house hold waste remediated the polluted soil and reversed most of the negative impact of the pollution.

References

  1. Ayansian, A. D. V., Adebola, M. A. and Adeyemi, A. O. (2014). Some microorganisms associated with soils exposed to cassava (MannihotEsculatum) peels. Amer. J.Res. Comm. 2(9):155-162.
  2. Adedokun, O.M. and A.E. Ataga, 2014. Effects of amendments and bioaugumentation of soil polluted crude oil, automotive gasoline oil, and spentengine oil on the growth of cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L. Walp). Sci. Res. Essay,2(5):147-149.
  3. Adekunle, A.A., Adekunle, I. M. &Tobit. (2012). Assessing the Effect of Bioremediation Agent Made from Local Resource Materials in Nigeria on Soil pH.J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Appl. Sci.3(3), 526-532.
  4. Amadi, A., Samuel, D. A. and Anthony, M. (2013). The effect of crude oilspillage on the soil microbial properties of a tropical rainforest.Journal of Water, Air and Soil Pollution 67 (1-3): 28-30.
  5. Atlas, R.M. (2005). Stimulated Petroleum Biodegradation. Critical Rev. Microbial.5:371-386.
  6. Atuanya, E.I. (2014). Effect of oil pollution on physical and chemical properties of soil. A case study of waste oil contaminated Delta soil in Bendel State. Nigeria J. Appl. Sci. 5: 155–76.
  7. Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H. (1986).Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, 2nd ed., part 1, Klute A. (Ed). Soil Sc. Soc.Amer.Madison, Wis.9: 363-375.
  8. Chang, S.T. and Hayes, W.A. (2014): The biology and cultivation of gardenegg. Academic press, New York. 169–181
  9. De-Song, E. (2010). The effect of a crude oil spill on cereals.Environ.Pollut. 22,:187–96.
  10. Fagbemi, T.N.F., Eleyinmi, A.F. Atum, H.N. and Akpanbang, O. (2005).Nutritional composition of fermented pumpkin seed for production of ogiriugu. Proceedings off the IFT annual meeting. P54B2, session 54B, fermented food and beverages: General
  11. Henery, G. & Hershey, C. (2002).Cassava in South America and Caribbean. In Hillocks, R. J., J. M. Thresh and A.C. Bellotti (Ed). Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization. CABI Publishing Oxon, UK and New York, USA.pp: 17-40.
  12. Kalichevsky, V.A. and Peters, E.H. (2010).Petroleum, our man of all work. The raw material, crude petroleum and natural gas. In Petroleum Products Handbook (V.B. Guthrie, ed.) pp. 1–22. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  13. Kayode, J., Oyedeji, A.A., Olowoyo O (2009). “Evaluation of the effect of pollution with lubricant oil on the physical and chemical properties of soil”. Pacific J. Sci. Tech. 10(1):387-391.
  14. Nunes, D., Salgado, A.M., GamaRodrigues, E.F.D., TaketaniR.G., Cunha, C.D.D.and Servulo, E.F.C. Use of plant materials for the bioremediationof soil from an industrial site. J Environ sci health A ToxHazaedSubst Environ Eng55(6)650-660
  15. Nwakaudu, et;al ( 2012) Impact of Cassava Processing Effluent on Agricultural Soil: A Case Study of Maize Growth.Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences3(5): 881-885
  16. Marschner, H. (2005). Mineral nutrition of higher plants.Second edition. Academic Press, New York, pp 889.
  17. Obidike, D.I. (2015). Oil spill contingency planning Proc. Int. Seminar Pet. Ind. and the Nig. Environ., 11–14, pp. 145–56.
  18. Ohanmu, E. O; Bako, S. P. and Adelanwa, MA (2017).Seasonal variation of Capsicum frutescensL.(Chilli Pepper) to crude oil spill on soils from Ologbo, Edo State.Ann. Exp. Bio. 2 (3):31- 35.
  19. Ohanmu, E.O; Igiebor, F.A; Bako, S.P. andDanazumi,I.B. (2018).Impact of Crude Oil on Physicochemical Properties and Trace Metals of Soil before and after Planting of Two Pepper species (Capsicum annum L and C. frutescensL).J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 22 (5) 765 – 768.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Nwodu J. A, Nwachukwu N, Ibegbulem C. O, Iwueke A. V, Akumefula M. I, Chukwuemeka U. V, Ohueri E. O "Health Implication of Physicochemical Properties of Sump Oil Polluted and Remediated Soil" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 8, Issue 3, pp.854-862, May-June-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2183192