Geological Lineament Pattern and Geomorphic Indices Characteristic Related To Geothermal Manifestation Appearance: A Case Study from Gunung Talang District and Its Surroundings, Solok Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia

Authors

  • Jordi Andrifa  Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
  • Nana Sulaksana  Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
  • Dewi Gentana  Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
  • Murni Sulastri  Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST218358

Keywords:

Geological Lineament, Geomorphic Indices, Geothermal Manifestation, Gunung Talang

Abstract

The study area is located in Gunung Talang District and its surroundings, Solok Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia. This area has a potential volcanic geothermal system and is generally covered by the Quarternary rocks which are deformed due to the tectonic activity of the Sumatran Fault System. Geological structure traces are not well preserved in such an area. This study aims to determine the geological lineament pattern associated with geological structure, the geomorphic indices characteristic related to the tectonic activity and rock permeability, and the geothermal manifestation appearance based on these two factors. Geological lineament pattern is identified using the remote sensing method. Geomorphic indices characteristic is calculated through the quantitative analysis of bifurcation ratio (Rb), drainage density (Dd), mountain front sinuosity (Smf), and lineament density (Ld). Geothermal manifestation appearance is evaluated through geospatial analysis using the overlay method on the geological lineament pattern and the geomorphic indices characteristic, which are then correlated with the distribution of geothermal manifestations. The main geological lineament patterns associated with the geological structures in the study area are north-northwest–south-southeast (NNW-SSE) and northeast-southwest (NE-SW). These lineament patterns indicate synthetic and antithetic strike-slip faults around the Sumani Segment of Sumatran Fault System successively. The geomorphic indices characteristics imply deformed areas (Rb values: 1.14-5.45), rough (Dd values: 2.00-2.66 km/km2), moderate (Dd values: 3.14-4.00 km/km2), and slightly fine landform textures (Dd values: 4.32-5.51 km/km2), active (Smf values: 1.05-1.64) and moderate to slightly active tectonisms (Smf values: 1.74-2.52), low (Ld values: 0.00-0.84 km-1), moderate (Ld values: 0.84-1.68 km-1), and high lineament densities (Ld values: 1.68-2.52 km-1) over the study area. The geothermal manifestations in the study area are divided into four groups based on their appearance characteristics, namely group I (Songsang and Garara hot springs), group II (Padang Damar, Bukit Gadang, and Batu Bajanjang hot springs), group III (Bukit Kili and Bawah Gunuang hot springs), and group IV (Gabuo Atas and Bawah Betung hot springs).

References

  1. M. F. Umam, F. Muhammad, D. W. Adityatama, and D. P. Purba, “Tantangan pengembangan energi panas bumi dalam perannya terhadap ketahanan energi di Indonesia,” Swara Patra, vol. 8, no. 3, September, 2018. [Online Serial]. Available: http://ejurnal.ppsdmmigas.esdm.go.id/sp/index.php/swarapatra/article/view/6. [Accessed: January 14, 2021].
  2. D. Sukarna, “Development of geothermal policies, potential resources and implementation target,” presented at Indo EBTKE Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2012.
  3. M. Boedihardi, A. Mulyono, A. Ginting, M. D. Mosby, and V. T. Radja, “Geology, energy potential and development of Indonesia's geothermal prospects,” Bulletin of the Geological Sociecty of Malaysia, no. 33, p. 369, November 1993. [Abstract]. Available: AAPG Datapages, https://archives.datapages.com/data/geological-society-of-malaysia/bulletins/033/033001/pdfs/369.htm. [Accessed January 14, 2021].
  4. A. F. Z and J. Hutahaean, “Penentuan struktur bawah permukaan tanah daerah potensi panas bumi dengan metode geomagnetik di Tinggi Raja Kabupaten Simalungun,” Jurnal Einstein, vol. 3, no. 12, December, 2015. [Online Serial]. Available: https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/einsten/article/view/5444/8429. [Accessed: January 14, 2021].
  5. L. Putriyana and H. Soekarno, “Numerical modelling of geothermal reservoir in Gunung Talang, West Sumatera, Indonesia,” RISET Geologi dan Pertambangan, vol. 30, no. 1, June, 2020. [Online Serial]. Available: https://jrisetgeotam.lipi.go.id/index.php/jrisgeotam/article/view/1058. [Accessed: January 16, 2021].
  6. P. H. Silitonga and Kastowo. Geological Map of the Solok Quadrangle, Sumatera, 2nd ed, scale 1:250.000. Bandung: Geological Research and Develompent Centre, 1995.
  7. A. Munandar, E. Suhanto, D. Kusnadi, A. Idral, dan M. Solaviah, “Penyelidikan terpadu daerah panas bumi Gunung Talang Kabupaten Solok - Sumatera Barat,” presented at Mineral Resources Inventory Activity Result Colloquium, Bandung, Indonesia, 2003.
  8. K. Sieh and D. Natawidjaja, “Neotectonics of Sumatran Fault, Indonesia,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 105, no. B12, December, 2000. [Online Serial]. Available: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2000JB900120. [Accessed: January 19, 2021].
  9. D. Santoso, M. E. Suparka, S. Sudarman, and S. Suari, “The geothermal fields in central part of the Sumatra Fault Zone as derived from geophysical data,” presented at World Geothermal Congress, Florence, Italy, 1995.
  10. N. M. Saptadji, Teknik Panas Bumi. Bandung: ITB Press, 2001.
  11. D. Burhan, “Pemetaan tipe mata air panas di Sumatera Barat (Studi kasus: 46 mata air panas di Kabupaten Pasaman, Pasaman Barat, Lima Puluh Kota, Agam, Tanah Datar, Solok, Sijunjung, dan Kabupaten Solok Selatan),” B.S. thesis, Dept. Phys., Univ. Andalas, Padang, Indonesia, 2017.
  12. F. A. Rachmawati, A. D. Haryanto, J. Hutabarat, and M. Sumaryadi, “Penentuan sumber panas sistem panas bumi Gunung Api Talang, Sumatera Barat berdasarkan sejarah panas dan geokimia air,” Padjadjaran Geoscience Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, February, 2019. [Online Serial]. Available: http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/geoscience/article/view/20841. [Accessed: January 12, 2021].
  13. S. Soengkono, “Te Kopia geothermal system (New Zealand)—the relationship between its structure and extent,” Geothermics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 780-782, 1999.
  14. S. Soengkono, “Analysis of digital topographic data for exploration and assessment of geothermal system,” In Proc. 21st New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, 1999, pp. 163-166.
  15. Suryantini and H. H. Wibowo, “Application of fault and fracture density (FFD) method for geothermal exploration in non-volcanic geothermal system: a case study in Sulawesi-Indonesia,” In Proc. World Geothermal Congress, 2010, p. 1.
  16. N. Sulaksana and A. H. Hamdani, “The analysis of remote sensing imagery for predicting structural geology in Berau Basin East Kalimantan,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 3, no. 4, April, 2014. [Online Serial]. Available: https://www.ijsr.net/get_count.php?paper_id=20131349. [Accessed: January 21, 2021].
  17. D. Hermawan dan Y. Rezky, “Delineasi daerah prospek panas bumi berdasarkan analisis kelurusan citra landsat di Candi Umbul-Telomoyo, Provinsi Jawa Tengah,” Buletin Sumber Daya Geologi, vol. 6, no. 1, May, 2011. [Online Serial]. Available: http://buletinsdg.geologi.esdm.go.id/index.php/bsdg/article/view/92. [Accessed: January 21, 2021].
  18. E. Sukiyah, Eds., Sistem Informasi Geografis: Konsep dan Aplikasinya dalam Analisis Geomorfologi Kuantitatif, 1st ed. Bandung: Unpad Press, 2017.
  19. Peta Rupa Bumi Digital Indonesia, Badan Informasi Geospasial Republik Indonesia, 2015-2019. [Online]. Available: http://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/portal-web/. [Accessed: January 25, 2021].
  20. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. [Accessed: January 25, 2021].
  21. J. P. Richards, “Lineaments revisited,” Society of Economic Geologists Newsletter, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 14-20, 2000.
  22. L. Q. Hung, O. Batelaan, and F. D. Smedt, “Lineament extraction and analysis, comparison of LANDSAT ETM and ASTER imagery. Case study: Suoimuoi tropical karst catchment, Vietnam,” In Proc. SPIE, presented at the Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology, SPIE, 2005, p. 59830T-1.
  23. Jamal, N. Sulaksana, E. Sukiyah, and Y. A. Sendjaja, “Analisis multi raster SRTM, radarsat dan landsat untuk karakterisisasi morfo-struktur dari geometri sesar di Daerah Binuang, Kalimantan Selatan, Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral, vol. 20, no. 1, February, 2019. [Online Serial]. Available: https://jgsm.geologi.esdm.go.id/index.php/JGSM/article/view/405. [Accessed: January 27, 2021].
  24. P. A. Allen and J. R. Allen, Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
  25. H. T. Verstappen, Applied Geomorphology: Geomorphological Surveys for Environmental Development. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc, 1983.
  26. R. E. Horton, “Erosional development of stream and their drainage basins: a hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 56, no. 3, p. 283, 1945.
  27. E. Sukiyah, “The erosion model of the Quarternary volcanic terrain in southern part of Bandung Basin,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Geol. Eng., Univ. Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia, 2009.
  28. D. Gentana, N. Sulaksana, E. Sukiyah, and E. T. Yuningsih, “Index of active tectonic assessment: quantitative-based geomorphometric and morphotectonic analysis at Way Belu Drainage Basin, Lampung Province, Indonesia,” International Journal of Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, December, 2018. [Online Serial]. Available: http://www.insightsociety.org/ojaseit/index.php/ijaseit/article/view/6089. [Accessed: February 2, 2021].
  29. W. B. Bull and L. D. McFadden, “Tectonic geomorphology north and south of the Garlock fault, California,” in Geomorphology in Arid Regions. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Geomorphology Symposium, 1st ed., D. O. Doehring, Eds. New York: Routledge, 1997, pp. 115-137.
  30. N. Sulaksana, Supriyadi, Ismawan, P. P. R. Rendra, and M. Sulastri, “Active fault analysis through quantitative assesment method in Cikapundung Sub Watershed,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 6, July, 2017. [Online Serial]. Available: https://ijsrst.com/IJSRST173634. [Accessed: February 5, 2021].
  31. J. C. Doornkamp, “Geomorphological approaches to the study of neotectonics,” Journal of the Geological Society, 143, pp. 335-336, 1986.
  32. D. Gentana, N. Sulaksana, E. Sukiyah, and E. T. Yuningsih, “Morphotectonics of Mount Rendingan Area related to the appearances of geothermal surface manifestations,” Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, vol. 6, no. 3, December, 2019. [Online Serial]. Available: http://ijog.bgl.esdm.go.id/index.php/IJOG/article/view/509. [Accessed: February 8, 2021].

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June-2021

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRST

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Jordi Andrifa, Nana Sulaksana, Dewi Gentana, Murni Sulastri "Geological Lineament Pattern and Geomorphic Indices Characteristic Related To Geothermal Manifestation Appearance: A Case Study from Gunung Talang District and Its Surroundings, Solok Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 8, Issue 3, pp.323-336, May-June-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST218358