Business Strategy of Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Perawang Mill, Riau, Indonesia using PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces, and SWOT Analysis under SOSTAC® Framework

Authors

  • Gery Azhari Putera  Magister Management Department, University of Bakrie, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Jerry Heikal  Magister Management Department, University of Bakrie, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST218624

Keywords:

PESTLE, SWOT, SOSTAC, Strategy, Business

Abstract

According to the company annual report (INKP Annual Report, 2019), PT. Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper (INKP) experienced a decrease in net sales of 3.4% and net profit of 53.4% from the previous year. The decline was followed by the Covid-19 pandemic which could affect the company's sales and profits. The study was conducted using a descriptive approach in order to capture the phenomena that occur through analysis of current conditions both internal and external using PESTLE, Porter, and SWOT analysis. Afterwards, it formulates the company objective, strategy, tactics, action, and evaluation or control using the SOSTACĀ® framework based on the analysis result. Data are obtained from interviews, observations, documentation, and publication reports. The results of the research describe that the predominant internal strategy factors on the Strengths of INKP are the product quality and production process efficiency, and the Weaknesses are product distribution and its distribution channels. Meanwhile, the predominant external strategic factors on Opportunities are other needs in pulp derivative product, availability of raw materials and fiscal policy, and as for Threats are a decrease in fine paper demand and technology adaptation. Using the Cartesian SWOT diagram, it is found that the results of EFAS and IFAS are in the ST main strategy quadrant, which is Diversification. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be formulated that the objectives of the INKP strategy are to make diversification product such as rayon fiber with masks as the final product from pulp as the raw materials in 1 year and shifting production from 56% paper and 43% pulp to 45% paper, 34% pulp, and 20% rayon fiber in 3 years to maintain sales volume and gain increased profit. The corporate level strategy is a diversification product while the business level strategy is a differentiation product in accordance with Porter's Generic Matrix. This investment has a positive value of both CAPM and NPV while CAPM has 0.0708 value. As for the IRR, the rate of return is 39.87%. Planned tactics and actions using project management with Gantt Chart within a project period of 1 year in the main activities of building production lines and marketing. Control and evaluation are carried out through the implementation of targets or KPI in accordance with work functions. EBIT and EBITDA is used at the final level of overall production and marketing.

References

  1. Ade Permata Surya. (2018). Customer Loyalty From Perspective of Marketing Mix Strategy and Customer Satisfaction A Study from Grab – Online Transportation in Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Volume 9, No. 3, Oktober 2019 Surya 394 – 406 ISSN : 2088-1231 E-ISSN: 2460-5328 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.22441/mix.2019.v9i3.001
  2. Alma, B. (2011). Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  3. Amalia, Aisyah. 2016. Perencanaan Strategi Pemasaran Dengan Pendekatan Bauran Pemasaran dan SWOT Pada Perusahaan Popsy Tubby. Jurnal Manajemen dan Start-Up Bisnis Volume 1, Nomor 3, Agustus 2016
  4. Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan, (2016) Warta Pengkajian Perdagangan, Volume III. No. 12, Tahun 2016
  5. Cahyono, Puguh. (2016). Implementasi Strategi Pemasaran Dengan Menggunakan Metode SWOT Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Penjualan Produk Jasa Asuransi Kecelakaan dan Kematian Pada PT. Prudential Cabang Lamongan. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen Volume I No.02, Februari 2016 ISSN : 2502-3780.
  6. Citra, T., & Santoso, S., B., (2016), Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Citra Merek Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Cetakan Continuous Form Melalui Kepercayaan Merek (Studi Pada Percetakan Jadi Jaya Group, Semarang), Jurnal Studi Manajemen & Organisasi 13 (2016) Juni 67-79.
  7. Ganiyu, e. a. (2012). Is Customer Satisfaction an Indicator of Customer Loyalty? Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol.2 (No.07 ), [14-20].
  8. Gillespia. (2007). Foundations of Economics – Additional chapter on the Business Strategy, PESTLE analysis of the macro-environment, Oxford University Press
  9. Hudaya, A., (2020), Analisa Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Niat Pembelian Kembali Pada Private Label, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, Volume 6, No. 01, Maret 2020 59-76
  10. Indriyani, Eka. (2017), Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan, Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi Volume 10 (2).
  11. Keller, K., (2013), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity Global Fourth Edition, England: Pearson Education Limited.
  12. Kotler P., & Keller KL., (2012), Marketing Management: Edition 14, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  13. Kotler Philip. 2006, Marketing Management Millenium, Edition Prentice Hall International New Jersey.
  14. Kotler Philiph and Keller, 2009, Marketing : An Introduction, Fourth Ed, Prentice Hall, Canada.
  15. Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2006), Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran (Bob Sabran, Penerjemah), Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
  16. Kotler, Philip dan Amstrong Gery. 2004. Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran. Jakarta: PT.Malanan Jaya Cermelang.
  17. Kussuma, P., Surachman, A., & Tanuatmodjo, H., (2016), Dampak Tingkat Profitabilitas Dan Nilai Pasar Pada Pergerakan Harga Saham PT. Prasidha Aneka Niaga Tbk, Journal of Business Management Education Volume 1, Number 2, August 2016, 97-103.
  18. Laporan Keuangan Kuartal 1 2020 PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk., (2020), 10 Desember 2020 https://idnfinancials.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/financial-statements/INKP/2020/1Q_2020_INKP_Indah+Kiat+Pulp+%26+Paper+Tbk.pdf
  19. Laporan Keuangan Kuartal 2 2020 PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk., (2020), 10 Desember 2020 https://emiten.kontan.co.id/download/0yNO88f8HJEWI-Wi1KmgYxy9M0R8iEbAdN091xHFWXo
  20. Laporan Keuangan Kuartal 3 2020 PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk., (2020), 10 Desember 2020 https://www.idx.co.id/Portals/0/StaticData/ListedCompanies/Corporate_Actions/New_Info_JSX/Jenis_Informasi/01_Laporan_Keuangan/02_Soft_Copy_Laporan_Keuangan//Laporan%20Keuangan%20Tahun%202020/TW3/INKP/IKPP%20Report-Billingual%2030%20September%202020.pdf
  21. Laporan Tahunan - Annual Report 2019 PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk, (2019), 10 Desember 2020 https://asiapulppaper.com/documents/20123/150293/INKP+-+Annual+Report+2019.pdf/
  22. Lembaga Pengembangan Bisnis dan Inkubasi Universitas Airlangga, (2018), Analisa Rantai Pasok (Supply Chain) Komoditas Unggulan Ekspor Indonesia : Pulp & Kertas.
  23. Lovelock, Wirtz. (2011). Services Marketing (People, Technology, Strategy). Pearson Education Limited. England
  24. Malau, H. (2017). Manajemen Pemasaran: Teori dan Aplikasi Pemasaran Era Tradisional Sampai Era Modernisasi Global. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  25. Maleki, S., Aghdaie, SFA., Shahin A., & Ansari, A., (2020), Investigating the Relationship Among the Kansei-Based Design of Chocolate Packaging, Consumer Perception, and Willingness To Buy, Journal Of Marketing Communications 2020, Vol. 26, No. 8, 836–855, https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1590855.
  26. Meliana, Y., & Simanjuntak, S., (2012), Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Beli Produk Makanan dan Minuman Usaha Kecil Menengah Kabupaten Tangerang, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vol.14, No. 2, September 2012: 164-172.
  27. Noor, Syamsudin. 2014. Penerapan Analisis SWOT Dalam Menentukan Strategi Pemasaran Daihatsu Luxio Di Malang (Studi Kasus Pada Pt. Astra International Tbk. – Daihatsu Malang). Jurnal INTEKNA, Tahun XIV, No. 2, Nopember 2014 : 102 – 209.
  28. Novianti, N., Endri, E., & Darlius, D. (2018). Kepuasan Pelanggan Memediasi Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Promosi Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan. Mix: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(1), 90. doi:10.22441/mix.2018.v8i1.006
  29. Nuraini, Aji, ST., & Anah, L., (2020), Pengaruh Promosi dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Minat Beli Kerudung Rabbani (Studi Kasus Pada Pondok Pesantren Putri Waisongo Cukir Jombang), Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, Volume 6, No. 02, Juni 2020 165-173
  30. Pardede, R., & Haryadi, TY., (2017), Pengaruh Persepsi Harga dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen Yang Dimediasi Kepuasan Konsumen, Journal of Business & Applied Management Vol. 10 No. 1 55-79.
  31. Qalati SA, Yuan LW, Iqbal S, Hussain RY, & Ali S., (2019), Impact of Price on Customer Satisfaction; mediating role of Consumer Buying Behaviour in Telecom Sector. Journal of Research 6: 150-165. https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/ .
  32. Rangkuti, F., (2005), Business Plan Teknik Membuat Perencanaan Bisnis dan Analisis Kasus, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  33. Rastogi, N and Trivedi, M.K. (2016). Technique – A Tool To Identify External Risks In Construction Projects International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 01 Jan-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
  34. Retnowati, N., D., (2011), Analisis CSF, SWOT dan TOWS Studi Kasus: PT Intan Pariwara Klaten, Jurnal Buana Informatika, Volume 2, Nomor 1, Januari 2011: 31-37.
  35. Rice, A., (2016), Analisa Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pertumbuhan Laba Dengan Ukuran Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Moderating Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia, Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil Volume 6, Nomor 01, April 2016 86-101.
  36. Sari, V., A., (2017), Pengaruh Harga, Kualitas Produk dan Citra Merek Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Teh Siap Minum Dalam Kemasan Teh Botol Sosro, Diponegoro University Journal Of Social And Politic, Business Administration 2017.
  37. Sekaran, U., (2006), Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  38. Setyorini, H., Effendi, M., dan Santoso, I. Analisis Strategi Pemasaran Menggunakan Matriks SWOT dan QSPM (Studi Kasus: Restoran WS Soekarno Hatta Malang). Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Agroindustri Volume 5 Nomor 1: 46-53.
  39. Shinta, A., (2011), Manajemen Pemasaran, Malang: UB Press.
  40. Sidharta, RBFI,. Sari, NLA., & Suwandha, W., (2018), Purchase Intention Pada Produk Bank Syariah Ditinjau dari Brand Awareness dan Brand Image dengan Trust Sebagai Variabel Mediasi, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Volume 8, No. 3, Oktober 2018 562-678.
  41. Siyoto, S., & Sodik, A., (2015), Dasar Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
  42. Stephani, SB., & Nashar, M., (2020), Pengaruh Harga, Citra Merek Dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk Online Jakmall, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, Volume 6, No. 1, Maret 2020 125-144.
  43. Suryana, P., & Dasuki, E., S., (2013), Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Pembelian dan Implikasinya Pada Minat Beli Ulang, Trikonomika Volume 12, No. 2, Desember 2013, Hal. 190–200.
  44. Susanti, V., Sumarwan, U., Simanjuntak, M., & Yusuf, E., (2019), Pengaruh Perceived Brand Quality, Perceived Value dan Switching Cost Terhadap Customer Satisfaction dan Brand Loyalty: Studi Pasar Industri Kimia di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Volume 9, No. 2, Juni 2019 282-297.
  45. Tjiptono, Fandy. 2004. Perspektif Manajemen dan Pemasaran Kontemporer. Yogyakarta : Andi.
  46. Yudaruddin, R. (2019), Forecasting: Untuk Kegiatan Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Samarinda: RV Pustaka Horizon.
  47. Zia, HK., Semiarty, R., dan Lita, RP. Analisis SWOT Sebagai Penentu Strategi Pemasaran Pada Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Baiturrahmah Padang. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas. 2018; 7 (Supplement 4).

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Gery Azhari Putera, Jerry Heikal "Business Strategy of Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Perawang Mill, Riau, Indonesia using PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces, and SWOT Analysis under SOSTAC® Framework" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 8, Issue 6, pp.252-270, November-December-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST218624