Pollen Analysis of Natural Honey Sample from the Chikhli taluka of Gujarat state India

Authors

  • Priya L. Dhumadiya  Research Scholar, Department of Chemistry, B.K.M. Science College, Valsad, Gujarat, India
  • Dilipkumar D. Patel  Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, B.K.M. Science College, Valsad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2293132

Keywords:

Honey Bees, Honey, Pollen Grains

Abstract

Diverse kinds of pollen and nectar forage by honey bees generate numerous types of honey which can be explored for the establishment of beekeeping venture in an area . The taluka of chikhli is rich floristically but neither pollen analytical study. Considering this, the present work has been undertaken to develop melissopalynological database from the chikhli taluka and to evaluate the potential of the study area for apiculture. Pollen analysis of 6 natural honey samples collected from the six different village of chikhli taluka reveals that 2 are uniflorae, 4 multiflorae . plant species used for study are : Acacia nilotica , Sesamum indikum , Trachyspermum ammi , Anethum sowa, Brassica nigra, and mix type of honey sample. There were many bee plant , which provides pollen and nectar throughout the year. it was found that on a average Ajwain honey contained the highest moisture (19.9)followed by Mustard (18.7%) and mix honey (18.4%). The lowest moisture (17.4%) was found in Babool honey. Highest carbohydrates obtained in Babool (78.99) and Sowa honey (78.85%) respectively . the lowest carbohydrates was found in mustard (74.27) honey. Highest natural sugar was found in mustard (74.89%)honey followed by Dill (72.70%). The lowest natural sugar found in babool (70.63%)honey. The findings recommend that the competent authority, on the basis of this pollen analytical data, may initiate bee-keeping ventures in this economically backward area and the beekeepers may have the opportunity to share the profitable medicinal honey market. This would benefit the rural health care improving the socio-economy of the local inhabitants of this region.

References

  1. Allchin FR ,Allchin B (1962) A Neolithic pot from Andhra Pradesh. Antiquity 302-303.
  2. Al Somal N, Coley KE, Molan PC, Hancock BM (1944) Susceptibility of Helicobacter pyroli to The Antimicrobial activity of Manuka Honey. Journal of Royal Society of Medicine 87: 9-12.
  3. Beck BF, Smedley D (1944) Honey and your health (Revised edn.) Dodd, Mead and Company Publisher, New York.
  4. Barth OM, Pinto Da Luz CF (2009) Palynological analysis of Brazilian red propolis samples. Journal of Apicultural Research and Bee World 48 (3): 181-188.
  5. Beck BF, Smedley D (1944) Honey and your health (Revised edn.) Dodd, Mead and Company Publisher, New York.
  6. Bedi R (1949) Honey (in Hindi). Himalaya Herbal Institute, Gurukul Kangdi, Hardwar.
  7.  Bhuyan KH (2002),Identification of bee plants and analysis of honey collected from different plant sources.Pakistan journal of biological sciences 5 (11):1199-1201.
  8. Culliney TW (1983) Origin and evolutionary history of the honey bees Apis. Bee world 64: 29-38.
  9. Costa MC, Vergara-Roig VA, Kivatinitz SC (2013) Amelissopalynological study of artisanal Honey produced in Catamarca (Argentina). Grana 52 (3): 229-237.
  10. Erdtman G (1960) The acetolysis method: A revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 54: 561-564.
  11. Dams LR (1978) Bees and honey-hunting scenes in the Mesolithic rock art of eastern Spain. Bee World 59: 45-53.
  12. Free J.B. 1993.Insect pollination of crops.Academic press. London,684 pp
  13. Hirapure P (2014)Morphological study of pollen as an Aid in criminal investigation.Scholars Academic journal of biosciences 2 (3): 187-192.
  14. Jeddar A, Kharsan YA, Ramsaroop UG, Bhamjee A, Hafejee E, Moosa A (1985) The Antibacterial action of Honey: An vitro study. South Africal Medical Journal 67.
  15. Joshi CG, Madhukanta A, Divan VV, Suryanaryana MC (1983) Bees and honey in ancient India.
  16. Jain AK,(2003) School of studies in botany jiwanji university gwalior.journal of Melissopalynology,M.P.
  17. Bhuyan KH (2002),Identification of bee plants and analysis of honey collected from different plant sources.Pakistan journal of biological sciences 5 (11):1199-1201.
  18. Louveaux J, Maurizio A, and Vorwohl G (1978) Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 51: 125-131.
  19. Lieux MH (1975) Dominant pollen type recorded from commercial Louisiona honey. Economic Botany 29: 87-96.
  20. Mathpal Y (1978) Prehistoric paintings of Bhimbetka, Central India. Ph. D Thesis. Dept. Archeology, University of Poona, Pune.
  21. Moar NT (1985) Pollen analysis of New Zealand honey. New Zealand. Journal of Agricultural Research 28: 39-70.
  22. Oliveira PP, van den Berg C, Santos Fdeard (2010) Pollen analysis of honeys from Caatinga Vegetation of the state of Bahia, Brazil. Grana 49(1): 66-75 .
  23. Pfister,R (1895) Vensucheiner Mikroskopie des honigs.Forschber.Lebensitt.u. ihreBez.z. Hygiene,Forens . Chem.,Pharmakogen (2) (1/2):1-9,29-35.
  24. Sawyer R (1988) Honey Identification. Cardiff Academic Press, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
  25. Song XY, Yao YF, Yang WD (2012) Pollen Analysis of Natural Honeys from the Central Region of Shanxi, North China.
  26. Von der Ohe W, PersanoOddo L, Piana L, Morlot M., Martin P (2004) Harmonized methods of Melissopalynology. Apidologie 35: 18-25.
  27. Wodehouse RP (1935) pollen grains ,New york-London: McGraw Hill.
  28. Winston M L (1987) The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, London.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Priya L. Dhumadiya, Dilipkumar D. Patel "Pollen Analysis of Natural Honey Sample from the Chikhli taluka of Gujarat state India" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 9, Issue 3, pp.628-637, May-June-2022. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2293132