An Examination of Inkjet and Laser Printed Documents using Stereomicroscope : A Forensic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2310018Keywords:
Forensic Documentation, Forgery, Inkjet, Laser, Stereomicroscope.Abstract
Printed documents are very frequently encountered in forensic cases as disputed or questioned documents. With increasing number of such cases, the printer inspection in has become a major requirement in questioned document examination in recent years considering the extensive use printers in document creation in comparison to handwritten papers. Also, the counterfeiting of printed documents by various printers have been recorded at a large scale in last two decades. In such cases, it is very much required by the investigators to examine and identify the type of printer used and to establish a linkage of the questioned document with the alleged printer. The current study is focused on the examination, analysis and identification of various types of printed documents on the basis of their specific characteristics including resolution, edge contrast, letter roughness and feathering formed from diverse printers to differentiate and classify them for forensic questioned document examination and to assist the forensic expert and questioned document examiner thorough such investigations. In this study 64 types of printers i.e. 32 inkjet printers and 32 printers comprise 1024 printed documents were collected for the analysis. The samples were analyzed using Olympus stereo microscopes SZX16 (4x magnification). Each printer has its uniqueness in printing documents, and this study aims to figure out that particular uniqueness at the documents after printing from the alleged printer. The observations revealed substantial differences in the letter’s characteristics. This study may be a useful to discriminate the documents printed from different types of printers.
References
- Carracedo, A., 2007. Applications in forensic science. Forensic Science International, 169, pp. S22-S23.
- Osborn, A., 1946. Questioned document. Albany, N.Y.: Boyd, pp.30-40.
- Hilton, O., 1988. The Evolution of Questioned Document Examination in the Last 50 Years. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 33(6), p.12574J.
- Devine, F., 1982. A Review of Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 27(4), p.12222J.
- Guo, Z., Zheng, H., You, C., Xu, X., Wu, X., Zheng, Z. and Ju, J., 2020. Digital Forensics of Scanned QR Code Images for Printer Source Identification Using Bottleneck Residual Block. Sensors, 20(21), p.6305.
- Brain, S., 2021. Computer Printer Industry Statistics - Statistic Brain. [online] Statistic Brain. Available at: [Accessed 2 April 2021].
- Sharma, B., Vijay, M., Alnajjar, A., Singh, N. and Basheer, S., 2019. A Comparative Study of Different Printed Documents to Estimate the Type of Printer Used. Journal of Forensic Research and Crime Studies, 101 (2), pp.1-7
- Wilkinson, H., 2013. Printers' Flowers as Evidence in the Identification of Unknown Printers: Two Examples From 1715. The Library, 14(1), pp.70-79.
- LU, W., GAO, X., ZENG, K. and HE, L., 2009. IMAGE QUALITY EVALUATION METRICS BASED ON HWD. JOURNAL OF INFRARED AND MILLIMETER WAVES, 28(1), pp.72-76.
- Darwish, S. and ELgohary, H., 2020. Building an expert system for printer forensics: A new printer identification model based on niching genetic algorithm. Expert Systems, 38(2).
- Shankar, K., Li, Z. and Allebach, J., 2019. Explaining and improving a machine-learning based printer identification system. Electronic Imaging, 2019(5), pp.544-1-544-6.
- KOVÁČ, O., LUKÁCS, P. and PIETRIKOVÁ, A., 2015. SOFTWARE TOOL FOR SCRIPTING AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPLIED IN JETLAB INKJET PRINTERS. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 15(4), pp.17-21.
- Bloomfield, L., 1999. Laser Printers. Scientific American, 281(4), pp.128-128.
- Blanchard, J., 2009. Laser printer use in the OR. AORN Journal, 89(5), p.914.
- Macgregor, A., 1992. Computer generated holograms from dot matrix and laser printers. American Journal of Physics, 60(9), pp.839-846Holmberg A, Olsson C, Hennig GW. TTX-sensitive and TTX-insensitive control of spontaneous gut motility in the developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2007;210:1084-1091
- Bottauscio, O., Zucca, M., Chiampi, M., Cambursano, C., Garramone, A. and Manzin, A., 2004. Modelling dynamic behaviour of dot-matrix printer heads. IEE Proceedings - Science, Measurement and Technology, 151(4), pp.305-311.
- Saini, K., Rathore, R., Kaur, R., Sharma, T. and P. Kaur, S., 2019. Establishing Sequence of Inkjet Printer, Laser Printer and Writing Ink Strokes using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences & Forensic Medicine, 1(10), pp.1367-1372.
- Blanco, J., 1993. Identifying documents printed by dot matrix computer printers. Forensic Science International, 59(1), pp.35-47.
- Sharma, B. K., Vajjey, K. K. Y., Bashir, R. and Raghuraghavendra, S., 2020. Analysis of Master Disguised Writing with the Aid of Specific Individual Writing Characteristics. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 11(2), pp. 116–119.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRST

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.