The Impact of Subcutaneous Vacuum Suction Drains on Abdominal Wound Complications in Rural Indian Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy

Authors

  • Dr. Didla Satya Rajakumari  Junior Resident General Surgery, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, India
  • Dr. Kanna Chandra Varma  Junior Resident General Surgery, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, India
  • Dr. Simma Indu Simha  Junior Resident General Surgery, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, India
  • Dr. Mohammed Raziya Sultana Begum  Junior Resident General Surgery, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, India
  • Dr. Rapaka Ashok Reddy   Head of Department of General Surgery, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST231022

Keywords:

Subcutaneous Vacuum Suction Drains Abdominal Wound, Wound Complication, Emergency Laparotomy, Post Laparotomy Complication, Suction Drain

Abstract

Surgical Site Infection and wound healing are reported more commonly in abdominal surgeries. Wound dehiscence following SSI is a significant concern. Subcutaneous negative suction drainage will reduce the incidence of SSI and wound dehiscence by draining seroma, promoting wound healing. Objective: This study's objective is to assess and evaluate the impact of subcutaneous drains on the incidence of surgical site infections following an emergency laparotomy procedure. Methodology: A total sample size of 50 patients within the inclusion criteria for 12 months was taken. Patients are followed for 15 days after surgery and are divided into 2 groups as Group A (study group): Emergency surgeries were done with subcutaneous drains. Group B (control group): Emergency surgeries were done without subcutaneous drains. Central randomization was performed. Results: 50 patients were included in the study, with 25 in each group. Hematoma formation was significantly higher among group B (24.0%) than among group A (4.0%). Seroma formation (p-value =0.03917), SSI rate (p-value =0.039), and wound dehiscence/burst abdomen (p-value =0.0415) were more in group B than in group A. The mean wound healing time (days) and mean hospital stay (days) were significantly more in group B. Conclusion: Surgical site infection is commonly due to abdominal cavity infection rather than nosocomial infection. The subcutaneous suction drainage tube is an effective method of abdominal wall closure in cases of peritonitis compared to conventional primary skin closure without drain as it significantly reduces the incidence of wound infection, dehiscence, wound secondary suturing and duration of hospital stay in SSI.

References

  1. Harmon LA, Husen VR, Roberts EK. Abdominal closure. Medscape. 2017. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1961789-overview. Accessed on 18 October 2018.
  2. Bruce J, Russell EM, Millinson J, Krukowksi ZH. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Tech Assess. 2001;5:1-194.
  3. Shikhman A, Tuma F. Abdominal Hematoma. Last Updated 16 June 2019. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519551/. Accessed on 18 October 2019.
  4. Coello R, Charlett AJ, Wilson V, Pearson WA, Borriello P. Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hospital Infection. 2005;60(2):93-103.
  5. Kujath P, Kujath C. Complicated skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections - are we threatened by multi-resistant pathogens. European J Med Res. 2010;15:544-53.
  6. Olson MM, Lee JT. Continuous, 10 years wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg. 1990;125:794-803.
  7. Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10 years prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60:27-40.
  8. Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, Saunders WB. Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect. 2009;10:539-44.
  9. Reilly J, Twaddle S, McIntosh J, Kean L. An economic analysis of surgical Bibliography 47 wound infection. J Hosp Infect. 2001;49:245-9.
  10. Sahu SK, Shergill JS, Sachan PK, Gupta P. Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Elective Abdominal Surgeries - A Prospective Study. Internet J Surg. 2011;26:1.
  11. Diana M, Hubner M, Eisenring MC, Zanetti G, Troillet N, Demartines N. Measures to prevent surgical site infections: what surgeons (should) do. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):280-8.
  12. Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KMF. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical site antisepsis. New England J Med. 2010;362(1):18-26.
  13. Alexander JW, Fischer JE, Boyajian M, Palmquist J, Morris MJ. The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Archives Surg. 1983;118(3):347-52.
  14. Murray BW, Huerta S, Dineen S, Anthony T. Surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a review of the nonpharmacologic tools of prevention. J Am College Surg. 2010;211(6):812-22.
  15. Manzoor B, Heywood N, Sharma A. Review of subcutaneous wound drainage in reducing surgical site infections after laparotomy. Surg Res Pract. 2015:1-6.
  16. Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg. 1992;29:559-623.
  17. Sadoshima J, Izumo S. Mechanical stretch rapidly activates multiple signal transduction pathways in cardiac myocytes: potential involvement of an autocrine/poracrine mechanism. EMBO J. 1993;12:1681-92.
  18. Subramonia S, Pankhurst S, Rowlands BJ, Lobo DN. Vacuum assisted closure of post-operative abdominal wounds: a prospective study. World J Surg. 2009;33:931-7.
  19. Baier PK, Gluck NC, Baumgartner U, Adam U, Fischer A, Hopt UT. Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections Bibliography 51 after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:639-43.
  20. Numata M, Tanabe H, Numata K, Suzuki Y, Tani K, Shiraishi R, et al. The efficacy of subcutaneous penrose drains for the prevention of superficial surgical site infections. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2010;43:221-8.
  21. Gupta P, Kumar R. Role of subcutaneous suction drain in reducing surgical site infections after emergency laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2017;4:2717-20.
  22. Razavi SM, Ibrahimpoor M, Sabouri A, Jafarian KA. Abdominal surgical site infections: incidence and risk factors at an Iranian teaching hospital. BMC surgery. 2005;5(2):3-5.
  23. Renvall S, Aho NAJ. Wound infection in abdominal surgery: a prospective study on 696 operations. Acta Chir Scand. 1980;146(1):25-30.
  24. Ussiri EV, Mkony CA, Aziz MR. Surgical wound infection in clean-contaminated and contaminated laparotomy wounds at Muhimbili National Hospital. East Cent Afr J S. 2005;10:19-23.
  25. Khan M, Khalil J, Muqim R. Rate and risk factors for surgical site infection at a tertiary care facility in Peshawar, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011;23:1-4.
  26. Nguyen D, Leod MB, Phung DC. Incidence and predictors of surgical site Bibliography 52 infections in Vietnam. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22:485-92.
  27. Vaghani YL, Chaudhari J, Navadiya S. A Study of subcutaneous negative pressure closure versus closure in laparotomy wound of Ileal perforation. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:24-6.
  28. Adejumo AA, Nuhu M, Afolaranmi T. Incidence of and risk factors for abdominal surgical site infection in a Nigerian tertiary care centre. Int J Infect Control. 2015;11:4.
  29. Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, Yamaguchi S, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Effects of subcutaneous drain for the prevention of incisional SSI in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1151-5.
  30. Patel BJ, Patel KH, Kharadi A, Panchal B. Role of subcutaneous corrugated drain in class IV surgical wound. Int Surg J. 2015;2:252-5.
  31. Chowdri NA, Qadri SA, Parray FQ, Gagloo MA. Role of subcutaneous drains in obese patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy: A cohort study. Int J Surg. 2007;5:404-7.
  32. Vashist M, Singla A, Malik V, Verma M. Abdominal Wall Closure in The Presence of Sepsis: Role of Negative Suction. Internet J Surg. 2013;29(1):407-12.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30

Issue

Volume 10, Issue 2, March-April-2023

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRST

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Didla Satya Rajakumari, Dr. Kanna Chandra Varma, Dr. Simma Indu Simha, Dr. Mohammed Raziya Sultana Begum, Dr. Rapaka Ashok Reddy "The Impact of Subcutaneous Vacuum Suction Drains on Abdominal Wound Complications in Rural Indian Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 10, Issue 2, pp.71-76, March-April-2023. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST231022