The Role of Geology in Hydrological Modeling : Impacts on Environmental Conservation

Authors

  • Dr. Ghanshyam Shakar   Assistant Professor, MATS School of Engineering and Information Technology, Chhattisgarh, India

Keywords:

Geology, Hydrological Modeling, Environmental Conservation, Groundwater Management, Sustainable Water Resources

Abstract

Geology plays a pivotal role in hydrological modeling by influencing water flow, storage, and quality, which are critical components of environmental conservation. Geological features such as rock types, soil composition, aquifers, and fault lines determine the spatial and temporal variability of hydrological processes. Understanding these features enables accurate modeling of surface and subsurface water dynamics, aiding in sustainable water resource management. This study examines how geological characteristics impact hydrological processes and their implications for conservation efforts. By integrating geological data into hydrological models, we highlight how groundwater recharge, discharge, and pollutant transport are influenced by subsurface heterogeneity. Case studies demonstrate the value of geologically-informed models in predicting flood events, managing aquifers, and mitigating contamination risks. The findings emphasize that neglecting geological inputs in modeling can lead to inaccurate predictions, jeopardizing conservation strategies. Incorporating advanced tools like remote sensing, GIS, and machine learning enhances the precision of geological and hydrological data integration. These approaches provide a robust framework for addressing pressing environmental challenges, such as groundwater depletion, wetland preservation, and habitat restoration. This research underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration between geologists and hydrologists to develop predictive models for sustainable environmental management. Adopting such practices is essential for balancing human needs with ecosystem protection, especially in regions vulnerable to climate change and overexploitation of water resources.

References

  1. Yossef, N.C.; Winsemius, H.; Weerts, A.; Beek, R.; Bierkens, M.F.P. Skill of a global seasonal streamflow forecasting system, relative roles of initial conditions and meteorological forcing. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 4687–4699.
  2. Yuan, X.; Wood, E.F.; Ma, Z. A review on climate-model-based seasonal hydrologic forecasting: Physical understanding and system development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 2015, 2, 523–536.
  3. Iliopoulou, T.; Aguilar, C.; Arheimer, B.; Bermúdez, M.; Bezak, N.; Ficchì, A.; Koutsoyiannis, D.; Parajka, J.; Polo, M.J.; Thirel, G.; et al. A large sample analysis of European rivers on seasonal river flow correlation and its physical drivers. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 73–91.
  4. Maurer, E.P.; Lettenmaier, D.P. Predictability of seasonal runoff in the Mississippi River basin. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108.
  5. Svensson, C. Seasonal river flow forecasts for the United Kingdom using persistence and historical analogues. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2016, 61, 19–35.
  6. Wang, Q.J.; Robertson, D.E.; Chiew, F.H.S. A Bayesian joint probability modeling approach for seasonal forecasting of streamflows at multiple sites. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45.
  7. Bazile, R.; Boucher, M.-A.; Perreault, L.; Leconte, R. Verification of ECMWF System 4 for seasonal hydrological forecasting in a northern climate. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 5747–5762.
  8. Cloke, H.L.; Pappenberger, F. Ensemble flood forecasting: A review. J. Hydrol. 2009, 375, 613–626.
  9. Paiva, R.C.D.; Collischonn, W.; Bonnet, M.P.; de Gonçalves, L.G.G. On the sources of hydrological prediction uncertainty in the Amazon. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 3127–3137.
  10. Wood, A.W.; Hopson, T.; Newman, A.; Brekke, L.; Arnold, J.; Clark, M. Quantifying streamflow forecast skill elasticity to initial condition and climate prediction skill. J. Hydrometeorol. 2016, 17, 651–668.
  11. Neukum, C.; Morales Santos, A.G.; Ronelngar, M.; Vassolo, S. Modelling groundwater recharge, actual evaporation and transpiration in semi-arid sites of the Lake Chad Basin: The role of soil and vegetation on groundwater recharge. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2021, 1–27.
  12. Diouf, O.C.; Weihermüller, L.; Diedhiou, M.; Vereecken, H.; Faye, S.C.; Faye, S.; Sylla, S.N. Modelling groundwater evapotranspiration in a shallow aquifer in a semi-arid environment. J. Hydrol. 2020, 587, 124967.
  13. Pastore, N.; Cherubini, C.; Doglioni, A.; Giasi, C.I.; Simeone, V. Modelling of the Complex Groundwater Level Dynamics during Episodic Rainfall Events of a Surficial Aquifer in Southern Italy. Water 2020, 12, 2916.
  14. Cotecchia, V. Le acque sotterranee e l’intrusione marina in Puglia: Dalla ricerca all’emergenza nella salvaguardia della risorsa. Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. D’Ital. 2014, 92, 1228.
  15. Boenzi, F.; Caldara, M.; Capolongo, D.; Dellino, P.; Piccarreta, M.; Simone, O. Late Pleistocene—Holocene landscape evolution in fossa Bradanica, Basilicata (southern Italy). Geomorphology 2008, 102, 297–306.
  16. De Santis, V.; Caldara, M.; Torres, T.; Ortiz, J.E. Two Middle Pleistocene Warm Stages in the Terrace Deposits of the Apulia Region (Southern Italy). Quat. Int. 2014, 332, 2–18.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Ghanshyam Shakar "The Role of Geology in Hydrological Modeling : Impacts on Environmental Conservation" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011,Volume 10, Issue 4, pp.679-692, July-August-2023.