Quantitative Risk Assessment For Industrial Safety

Authors

  • Rutik Hemanbhai Majethiya  Department of Chemical Engineering, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
  • Dr. Ashish Unnarkat  Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Keywords:

QRA, Risk Assessment, Safety Analysis

Abstract

Risk assessment (RA) is a means of making a systematic analysis of the risks from hazardous activities, and forming a rational evaluation of their significance, in order to provide input to a decision-making process. RA is sometimes called ‘probabilistic risk assessment’ or ‘probabilistic safety analysis’; terms originally used in the nuclear industry. The term ‘quantified risk assessment’ is synonymous with QRA as used here. The term ‘quantitative risk analysis’ is widely used, but strictly this refers to the purely numerical analysis of risks without any evaluation of their significance [5]. RA is probably the most sophisticated technique available to engineers to predict the risks of accidents and give guidance on appropriate means of minimising them. Nevertheless, while it uses scientific methods and verifiable data, RA is a rather immature and highly judgemental technique, and its results have a large degree of uncertainty. Despite this, many branches of engineering have found that RA can give useful guidance. However, RA should not be the only input to decision-making about safety, as other techniques based on experience and judgement may be appropriate as well.

References

  1. Paltrinieri, N., Patriarca, R., Stefana, E., Brocal, F. and Reniers, G., 2020. Meta- learning for safety management. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 82, pp.169-174.
  2. Swuste, P., van Gulijk, C., Groeneweg, J., Guldenmund, F., Zwaard, W. and Lemkowitz, S., 2020. Occupational safety and safety management between 1988 and 2010: Safety science, 121, pp.303-318.
  3. Asadzadeh, A., Arashpour, M., Li, H., Ngo, T., Bab-Hadiashar, A. and Rashidi, A., 2020. Sensor-based safety management. Automation in Construction, 113, p.103128.
  4. Grote, G., 2020. Safety and autonomy: A contradiction forever?. Safety science,127, p.104709.
  5. Jiang, W., Liang, C. and Han, W., 2019. Relevance proof of safety culture in coalmine industry. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(5), p.835.
  6. Çalış, S. and Büyükakıncı, B.Y., 2019. Occupational health and safety management systems applications and a system planning model. Procedia Computer Science, 158, pp.1058-1066.
  7. Pereira, E., Ahn, S., Han, S. and Abourizk, S., 2020. Finding causal paths between safety management system factors and accident precursors. Journal of management in engineering, 36(2), p.04019049.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-22

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Rutik Hemanbhai Majethiya, Dr. Ashish Unnarkat, " Quantitative Risk Assessment For Industrial Safety, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp.1193-1206, May-June-2023.