Optimizing IoT Networks in Smart Agriculture Using Probabilistic Models and Machine Learning Algorithms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST24116169

Keywords:

Internet of Things, Smart Agriculture, Network Optimization, Probabilistic Models, Machine Learning, Precision Farming, Bayesian Networks, Hidden Markov Models, Adaptive Routing

Abstract

This study aims to enhance the performance of Internet of Things (IoT) networks in smart agriculture by integrating probabilistic models and machine learning algorithms. The research addresses the need for efficient, reliable, and scalable IoT infrastructures to support precision farming and sustainable agricultural practices in increasingly complex and data-intensive farming environments. A multi-faceted approach was employed, combining probabilistic modeling and machine learning techniques. IoT sensor networks were simulated using real-world agricultural data, supplemented by a small-scale field deployment. Bayesian networks and Hidden Markov Models were applied to capture system dynamics, while Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, and Long Short-Term Memory networks were used for pattern recognition and predictive analytics. Network performance was evaluated using metrics including latency, throughput, packet loss rate, energy efficiency, scalability, reliability, and data accuracy. The integrated approach significantly improved IoT network performance in agricultural settings. Key improvements include: 25% reduction in latency, 35% increase in throughput, 60% decrease in packet loss rate, 30% improvement in energy efficiency, and 6.5% increase in data accuracy. Adaptive routing algorithms, informed by machine learning predictions, were particularly effective in managing network load during peak agricultural seasons, reducing latency by 18% during these periods. The study relied primarily on simulations and limited field trials. Comprehensive real-world implementation across diverse agricultural environments and larger scale deployments is necessary to fully validate the findings. The research did not address potential cybersecurity challenges in optimized IoT networks, which remains an important area for future investigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dlodlo N, Foko T, Mvelase P, Mathaba S. The state of affairs in Internet of Things research. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation. 2012;15(3):244-258.

Farris I, Taleb T, Iera A, Campolo C. On the convergence of IoT and cloud computing for smart agriculture: Intelligent IoT gateway design. IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). 2015;357-362.

Gong X, Zhang W, Li Y. Hierarchical management for IoT networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2015;53(3):98-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060488

Jayaraman PP, Yavari A, Georgakopoulos D, Morshed A, Zaslavsky A. Internet of Things platform for smart farming: Experiences and lessons learnt. Sensors. 2016;16(11):1884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s16111884

Kamilaris A, Kartakoullis A, Prenafeta-Boldú FX. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018;143:23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037

Kushwaha N, Nigam S, Narayan S. A review on smart agriculture: IoT applications, technologies and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. 2018;7(6):141-145.

Ning H, Hu S. Internet of Things: An emerging industrial or a new major area of study. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2012;1(1):1-2.

Raza S, Wallgren L, Voigt T. Security and privacy for the Internet of Things: A survey of challenges and solutions. Security and Communication Networks. 2017;2017:1-36.

Li D, Wen Y, Wang H, Wu D. Cloud-assisted green Internet of Things for smart agriculture. IEEE Access. 2018;6:44298-44309.

Da Silva Pinto M, Dos Santos RF, Da Silva Martins AC. Energy-efficient IoT network design for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019;162:1120-1128.

Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G. The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks. 2010;54(15):2787-2805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

Sarker IH, Kayes ASM, Badsha S, Alqahtani H, Watters P, Ng A. Cybersecurity data science: An overview from machine learning perspective. Journal of Big Data. 2020;7(1):41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00318-5

Zhang Q, Cheng L, Boutaba R. Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications. 2010;1(1):7-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13174-010-0007-6

Rathore MM, Paul A, Hong WH, Seo H, Awan I, Saeed S. Exploiting IoT and big data analytics: Defining smart digital agriculture boundaries. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2016;124:273-284.

Shi Y, Eberhart RC. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. 1998;69-73.

Gandhi SJ, Kang I. Hybrid evolutionary algorithms for IoT network optimization in precision agriculture. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2022;18(6):4123-4132.

Luvisi A, De Bellis L, Aprile A. Plant pathology and information technology in the IoT era. Phytopathology. 2016;106(6):594-603.

Pham DT, Karaboga D. Intelligent optimisation techniques: Genetic algorithms, tabu search, simulated annealing, and neural networks. London: Springer; 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0721-7_3

Vasisht D, Hong G, Kumar S, Chandra R. Farmbeats: An IoT platform for data-driven agriculture. USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. 2017;13:515-528.

Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data. 2018;5:180214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214

Downloads

Published

18-11-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Optimizing IoT Networks in Smart Agriculture Using Probabilistic Models and Machine Learning Algorithms. (2024). International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 11(6), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST24116169

Similar Articles

1-10 of 148

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.