Study On Uniformity of Pure Iodine with Concentration 370 Mg/Ml in Dual Energy Computed Tomography Images
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST24116178Keywords:
dual energy CT, iodine material density, uniformityAbstract
Objective: To analyze a uniformity of pure iodine concentration (with concentration of 370 mg/ml) in dual energy computed tomography (DECT) images. Method: To perform this study, an in-house phantom was used. The phantom has a diameter of 16 cm, a length of 5 cm, and has 5 holes with a diameter of 1.5 cm. Iodine with concentration of 370 mg/ml were positioned at each hole of the phantom. The phantom was scanned using the GE Revolution Apex (ultrafast kV switching type DECT) with voltages of 80/140 kV. The image was reconstructed and displayed as the Iodine material density (MD) map using the Gamestrone Spectral Imaging (GSI Viewer) application. To obtain the uniformity, regions of interest (ROIs) were located at the center and edges at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock. Results: The measured concentration is lower than set concentration of 370 mg/ml. It was found that average measured iodine concentrations are 277.8, 311.2, 287.5, 312.6, and 303.1 mg/ml at the center and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock, respectively. The maximum value of the measured iodine concentration is at 9 o’clock, and the minimum value of the measured iodine concentration is at center position. Hence, the iodine uniformity was less than 37 mg/ml. Conclusion: Measurement of iodine uniformity on DECT images was carried out. Uniformity is below 10% of the iodine concentration value.
Downloads
References
Forghani R, de Man B, Gupta R. Dual-energy computed tomography: Physical principles, approaches to scanning, usage, and implementation: Part 2. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2017;27(3):385-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2017.03.003
Alvarez RE, Seppi E. A comparison of noise and dose in conventional and energy selective computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1979;26(2):2853–2856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.1979.4330549
McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG. Dual- and multi-energy CT: Principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology. 2015;276(3):637–653. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142631 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142631
Seeram R. Computed tomography: Physical principles and recent technical advance. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2010;41:87-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2010.04.001
Altenbernd J, Heusner TA, Ringelstein A, Ladd SC, Forsting M, Antoch G. Dual-energy-CT of hypervascular liver lesions in patients with HCC: investigation of image quality and sensitivity. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(4):738–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1964-7
Shuman WP, Green DE, Busey JM, et al. Dual-energy liver CT: effect of monochromatic imaging on lesion detection, conspicuity, and contrast-to-noise ratio of hypervascular lesions on late arterial phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):601–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11337
Muenzel D, Lo GC, Yu HS, et al. Material density Iodine images in dual-energy CT: Detection and characterization of hypervascular liver lesions compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017;95:300-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.035
Anam C, Naufal A, Matsubara K, Fujibuchi T, Dougherty G. A method for quantification of noise non-uniformity in computed tomography images: A computational study. J Phys Its Appl. 2023;5(2):48-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpa.v5i2.17615
Greffier J, Van Ngoc Ty C, Fitton I, Frandon J, Beregi JP, Dabli D. Impact of phantom size on low-energy virtual monoenergetic images of three dual-energy CT platforms. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(19):3039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13193039
International Atomic Energy Agency. Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students, Medical Imaging: Principles and Practices. Vienna. 2014.
Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency. X-ray machine suitability test guidelines series CT Scan Test Method. 2017.
Lestari R, Heru N. Evaluation of noise and uniformity values of CT Scan images before and after daily calibration. Jupeten. 2022;2(1):6-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53862/jupeten.v2i1.002
Nowik P, Bujila R, Poludniowski G, Fransson A. Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(4):254-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5469
Kojima T, Shirasaka T, Kondo M, et al. A novel fast kilovoltage switching dual energy CT with deep learning: Accuracy of CT number on virtual monochromatic imaging and iodine quantification. Phys Med. 2021;81:253-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.018
Yamauchi H, Buehler M, Goodsitt MM, Keshavarzi N, Srinivasan A. Dual-Energy CT–Based differentiation of benign posttreatment changes from primary or recurrent malignancy of the head and neck: comparison of spectral Hounsfield units at 40 and 70 keV and Iodine concentration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:580–587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14896
Gao SY, Zhang XY, Wei W, et al. Identification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules by in vivo Iodine concentration measurement using single-source dual energy CT: A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004816
Greffier J, Villani N, Defez D, Dabli D, Si-Mohamed S. Spectral CT imaging: Technical principles of dual-energy CT and multienergy photon-counting CT. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104(4):167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.11.003
Samei E, Pelc NJ. Computed tomography: Approaches, applications, and operations. Springer International Publishing. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26957-9
Gaddam DS, Dattwyler M, Fleiter TR, Bodanapally UK. Principles and applications of dual energy computed tomography in neuroradiology. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2021;42(5):418–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2021.07.001
Fernández-Pérez GC, Fraga Piñeiro C, Oñate Miranda M, Díez Blanco M, Mato Chaín J, Collazos Martínez MA. Dual-energy CT: Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiología, 2022;64(5):445–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.06.003
Anam C, Naufal A, Budi WS, Sutanto H, Haryanto F, Dougherty G. IndoQCT: a platform for automated CT image quality assessment. Med Phys Int J. 202;11:328–336.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.