Density Estimation for Financial Fraud Detection: A Multivariate Kernel-Based Approach

Authors

  • Basavaraj Talawar Department of Statistics, Karnatak University, Dharwad PIN:580 003, Karnataka, India Author
  • A. S. Talawar Department of Statistics, Karnatak University, Dharwad PIN:580 003, Karnataka, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2512159

Keywords:

Insider trading, volume-weighted Kernel density, Hindenburg report, market manipulation, adaptive bandwidth

Abstract

The detection of insider trading has become increasingly challenging due to the complexity of modern financial markets. This paper introduces a novel approach using Volume-Weighted Multivariate Kernel Density Estimation to identify potential insider trading activities. By integrating volume-weighting with the Kernel Density Estimation framework, this method effectively captures abnormal price-volume relationships, providing a sophisticated means to flag irregular trading behaviour. This paper proposes a robust approach using Volume-Weighted Multivariate Kernel Density Estimation to detect abnormal trading patterns linked to insider trading and this approach improves traditional Kernel Density Estimation by incorporating trading volume as a weighting factor, allowing it to capture the joint distribution of stock returns and trading volumes. The model’s application is tested on data from companies targeted by Hindenburg Research, including Nikola Corporation, Clover Health, and Adani Enterprises. The results show clear pre-event anomalies, including increased trading volumes and price movements preceding the report releases. By utilizing adaptive bandwidth selection, Volume-Weighted Multivariate Kernel Density Estimation balances bias and variance to refine detection of insider trading activities in both dense and sparse regions of the data. The emergence of reports from activist short-sellers like Hindenburg Research has triggered significant market reactions, often accompanied by allegations of insider trading. This methodology is highly sensitive to abnormal volumes that may signal preemptive insider trading ahead of major market events, such as the release of damaging reports. This research demonstrates that VW-MKDE offers enhanced sensitivity to volume-weighted deviations, enabling the detection of abnormal trading behavior associated with potential insider information. Our findings highlight the tool’s capacity to assist regulators and analysts in identifying suspicious market activities in real-time, particularly during periods of heightened market volatility and post-report market responses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ameis, L., Kuss, O., Hoyer, A., & Möllenhoff, K. (2023). A non-parametric proportional risk model to assess a treatment effect in time-to-event data. Mathematical Institute, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Bielefeld University.

Acerbi, C., & Tasche, D. (2002). On the coherence of Expected Shortfall. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1487-1503.

Aggarwal, R. K., & Wu, G. (2003). Stock market manipulation — Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1407-1430.

Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203-228.

Biswas, S., & Sen, R. (2018). Kernel based estimation of spectral risk measures. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 17(3), 199-214.

Bolancé, C., Ayuso, M., & Guillén, M. (2011). Nonparametric approach to analysing operational risk losses. Departament d’Econometria, Estadística i Economia Espanyola, RFA-IREA, University of Barcelona, Spain.

Brandtner, M. (2019). Spectral risk measures: Properties and limitations: Comment on Dowd, Cotter, and Sorwar. The Journal of Risk, 21(3), 1-7.

Breunig, R. (2006). An introduction to nonparametric and semi-parametric econometric methods. Australian National University, Sydney.

Efromovich, S. (2009). Nonparametric regression with missing data: Theory and applications. Statistical Science, 24(3), 452-469.

Frees, E. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of the probability of ruin. North American Actuarial Journal, 8(3), 1-20.

Haug, J., Hens, T., & Wöhrmann, P. (2013). Risk aversion in the large and in the small. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 86, 83-95.

Peña, E. A. (2012). Nonparametric statistical methods for complete and censored data. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 24(1), 27-46.

Rizvi, B. A., Belatreche, A., Bouridane, A., & Watson, I. (2017). Detection of stock price manipulation using kernel-based principal component analysis and multivariate density estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(5), 1126-1138.

Wächter, H. P., & Mazzoni, T. (2010). Consistent modeling of risk averse behavior with spectral risk measures (Working paper).

Wang, B., & Wang, X. (2019). Bandwidth selection for weighted kernel density estimation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 89(4), 623-639.

Downloads

Published

23-02-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Density Estimation for Financial Fraud Detection: A Multivariate Kernel-Based Approach. (2025). International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 12(1), 676-695. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2512159

Similar Articles

1-10 of 86

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.