A Comparative Analysis of Ring Signature Schemes for Anonymous Feedback Systems

Authors

  • Tanvi Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Delhi-110006, India Author
  • Preeti Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Delhi-110006, India Author
  • Dr. Ravinder M. Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Delhi-110006, India Author
  • Dr. Vijay Kumar Yadav Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Delhi-110006, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST251222707

Keywords:

Anonymous Feedback System, ECC, Ring Signature, Privacy Preservation, Digital Signature

Abstract

With the rise of the demand for secure and unidentifiable communication, feedback systems in academic and organizational settings face extreme difficulties in terms of user privacy and feedback attestation. Current approaches, particularly anonymized surveys, rely on third-party frameworks which come with high risks of data leakage and impersonation. The goal of this study is to develop an anonymous feedback system using cryptographic ring signatures that guarantees user anonymity while validating feedback authenticity. The study focuses on the comparison of three cryptographic algorithms: RSA, ECC, and LSAG, to find the most effective and secure solution for such systems. This study incorporated the design of a feedback system with ring signatures that enabled the anonymization of responses. To provide an interface that allows smooth interaction with users, a frontend was developed and combined with the backend where key cryptographic algorithms (RSA, ECC, LSAG) were implemented and evaluated based on effectiveness, computational requirements, and key dimensions. An excellent option for safe anonymous feedback systems is the ECC-based ring signature technique, which showed excellent performance. Future research could examine how the technology can be applied in real-world settings and integrated with other privacy-enhancing technologies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shaheen, Abida & Azam, Fahad & Qureshi, Khurram. (2021). Anonymous Feedback: A Real-time Feedback to Capture Students’ Engagement in Learning Process: AnonymousFeedback. 10.2991/assehr.k.210930.011.

Dreher, Heinz & Maurer, Hermann. (2006). The Worth of Anonymous Feedback.

S. Inshi and A. Youssef, "Design and implementation of an online anonymous feedback system," 2008 24th Biennial Symposium on Communications, Kingston, ON, Canada, 2008, pp. 58-61, doi: 10.1109/BSC.2008.4563205. keywords: {Feedback;File servers;Authentication;Electronic voting;Ethics;Digital signatures;Protocols;Information systems;Maintenance engineering;Design engineering},

Rubin, Stephen & American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. (1970). Evaluation of an Anonymous Feedback System in College Classes [microform] / Stephen Rubin. [Washington, D.C.]: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED042406

Bergstrom, T., Harris, A., Karahalios, K. (2011). Encouraging Initiative in the Classroom with Anonymous Feedback. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. INTERACT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23774-4_4

Downloads

Published

30-04-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles