Correlation of Demography, Liver Function Tests, and Lipid Profile with Fibroscan Results in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in West Bengal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST251492Keywords:
Demography, liver function test, lipid profile, fibroscan of liver, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, West BengalAbstract
Introduction: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a prevalent cause of chronic liver disease that can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Early detection of advanced fibrosis is crucial in preventing disease progression. Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard, its limitations necessitate reliable, non-invasive alternatives such as transient elastography (FibroScan) and serum-based scoring systems. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the correlation of demographic parameters, liver function tests, and lipid profiles with FibroScan-based fibrosis stages in NAFLD patients, as well as to compare the diagnostic performance of the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, the BARD score, and the AST/ALT ratio. Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study enrolled 497 NAFLD patients (271 males and 226 females) at a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal from January 2020 to December 2024. Exclusion criteria included alcohol intake, viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, drug-induced liver injury, and other metabolic liver diseases. Fibrosis stages (F0–F4) were determined by FibroScan. APRI, FIB-4, and BARD scores were calculated, and statistical analysis included Pearson’s correlation, regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Most patients were in the early stages—F0 (33.8%), F1 (30.6%), and F2 (23.4%). Age indicated a weak positive correlation with fibrosis stage (r = 0.111, p = 0.0135). APRI and FIB-4 demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy (Area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66 each) with high specificity but moderate sensitivity. The BARD score demonstrated lower discrimination (AUC = 0.58) but performed better in cirrhosis. The AST/ALT ratio demonstrated poor diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.53). Females exhibited significantly higher BARD scores and AST/ALT ratios. Conclusion: APRI and FIB-4 are moderately effective, low-cost diagnostic tools for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD, but their low sensitivity limits their use as standalone diagnostic tests. Combining non-invasive scores with FibroScan enhances staging accuracy, especially in resource-limited settings. Early integration of such combined approaches may help reduce disease progression and improve patient outcomes.
📊 Article Downloads
References
Newman T. What does the liver do? Medical News Today [Cited 12 January 2021]. Available from: http://www.medicinenewstoday.com/articles/305075.php.
Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: Impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387-1395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20466
Salamone F, Bugianesi E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The hepatic trigger of the metabolic syndrome. Journal of Hepatology. 2010;53:1146-1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.013
Micelle Biopharma. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [cited 12 January 2021]. In: Micelle Biopharma [Internet]. Available from: http://micellebiopharma.com/non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-and-non-alcoholic-steatohepatitis-sc410/
Alkhouri N, Kay MH. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [cited 12 January 2021]. In: American College of Gastroenterology [Internet]. Available from: http://gi.org/topics/fatty-liver-disease-nafld/
McPherson S, Stewart SF, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP. A simple non-invasive fibrosis scoring system can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2010;59:1265-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.216077
Kang JS, Lee MH. Noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic assessment tools for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease. In: Tsoulfas G. Liver Cirrhosis. Georgios Tsoulfas, IntechOpen. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68317
Adams LA, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2005;172:890-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.045232
Friedman, Scott L. Liver fibrosis – from bench to bedside. Journal of Hepatology. 2003;38:38-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00429-4
Bataller B, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115:209-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI24282
Hernandez-Gea V, Friedman SI. Pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease. 2011;6:425-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130246
Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalhflcisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS. A simple non-invasive index can predict significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:518-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50346
Westin J, Lagging LM, Wejstal R, Norkrans G, Dhillon AP. Interobserver study of liver histopathology using the Ishak scores of patients with chronic hepatitis C versus infection. Liver. 1999;19:183-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.1999.tb00033.x
Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. Practice of liver biopsy in France: Results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of liver (AFEF). Hepatology. 2000;32:472-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2000.16602
Fallatah HI. Noninvasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis: An overview. Advances in Hepatology. 2014;2014:357287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/357287
Galani S, Gramantieri L, Vennroli N, Piscaglia Siringo S et al. What is the criterion for differentiating chronic hepatitis from compensated cirrhosis? Journal of Hepatology. 1997;27:979-985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(97)80140-7
Hung CH, Lu SN, Wang JH, Lee CM, Chen TM, Tung HD et al. Correlation between ultrasonographic and pathologic diagnosis of hepatitis B and C virus-related cirrhosis. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;38:153-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350300025
Saudeh S, Younosai ZM, Remer FM, Gramlich T, Ong JP, Hurley M et al. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:745-750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.35354
Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F et al. Transient elastography: A new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2003;29:1705-1713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001
Armenia B, Moosavy SH, Banookh F, Zoghi C. FIB-4, APRI and AST/ALT ratio compared to FibroScan for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Bandar Abbas, Iran. BioMed Central Gastroenterology. 2021;21:453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02038-3
Danaf LA, Kamarevvine MH, Farhat AHS. Correlation between FibroScan and laboratory tests in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients for assessing liver fibrosis. World Journal of Hepatology. 2022;14(4):744-753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i4.744
Wong VW-S, Adams LA, Ledinghen V, Wong GL-H, Sookolan S. Non-invasive biomarkers in NAFLD and NASH – current progress and future promise. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;15(8):461-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-018-0014-9
Shaheen AAM, Myer RP. Diagnostic accuracy of the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio for predicting hepatitis C-related fibrosis: A systematic review. Hepatology. 2007;46(3):912-921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21835
Jin W, Lin Z, Xin Y, Jiang X, Dong Q, Xuan S. Diagnostic accuracy of the aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index for predicting hepatitis B-related fibrosis: A leading meta-analysis. BioMed Central Gastroenterology. 2012;2(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-14
Chalasani N, Younassi Z, Levine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guideline from the American Association for the Study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29367
Machado MV, Cortez-Pinto. Noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A critical appraisal. Journal of Hepatology. 2013;58(5):1007-1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2012.11.021
Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HLY, Chen CJ et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: A 2015 update. Hepatology International. 2016;10(1):1-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-015-9675-4
World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention, care, and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection. Cited 15 March 2016.
Shiha G, Ibrahim A, Helmy A, Sarin SK, Omata M, Kumar A et al. Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: A 2016 update. Hepatology International. 2017;11(1):1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-016-9760-3
Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in HCV infection. Hepatology. 2006;43(6):1317-1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21178
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0