Mucoadhesive Delivery System : A Smart way to Improve Bioavailability of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs

Authors

  • Nirmala Sunil Yewale M Pharm, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author
  • Mrs. Trusha Shangrapawar M Pharm, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author
  • Dr. Ashok Bhosale M Pharm, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author

Keywords:

Bioavailability , Hepatic First Pass Metabolism , Polymers, Emulsifiers

Abstract

The Conventional Oral Administration Of Many Poorly Soluble Drugs Exhibits Poorly Oral Bioavailability- Oral Mucosa Has Been Recognized As A Potential Site For The Delivery Of Therapeutic Compounds. The Mucoadhesive Formulation Can Adhere To The Mucosal Membrane Through Various Interaction Mechanisms And Enhance The Retention And Permeability Of Bioactive Compounds. Absorption Of Bioactive Compounds From The Mucosa Can Improve Bioavailability, As This Route Bypasses The Hepatic First-Pass Metabolism And Transit Through The Gastrointestinal Tract. The Mucosal Administration Is Convenient, Simple To Access, And Reported For Increasing The Bioactive Concentration In Plasma. Many Mucoadhesive Polymers, Emulsifiers, Thickeners Used For The Pharmaceutical Formulation Are Accepted In The Pharmaceutical Sector. Introducing Mucoadhesive Formulations Specific To The Poorly Water Soluble Drug Sector Will Be A Game-Changer As We Are Still Looking For Different Ways To Improve The Bioavailability Of Many Bioactive Compounds. This Article Describes The Overview Of Oral Mucosa, The Concept Of Mucoadhesion And Related Theories, And Different Techniques Of Mucoadhesive Formulations. Finally The Classification Of Mucoadhesive Polymers And The Mucoadhesive Systems Designed For The Effective Delivery Of Active Pharmaceutical Compound Are Presented. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Lindenberga, S. Koppb, J.B. Dressmana, Classification Of Orally Administered Drugs On The World Health Organization Model List Of Essential Medicines According To The Biopharmaceutics Classification System, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 58, 265-278 (2004).

S.S. Davis, Formulation Strategies For Absorption Windows. Drug Disc. Today 10(4), 249257 (2005)

A. Dahan, G.L. Amidon, Provisional Bes Classification Of The Leading Oral Drugs On The Global Market, In Burger's Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery And Development, (Edited By D.J. Abraham And D.P. Rotella), Pp. 353- 366, Seventh Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc (2010).

F.J. Luque And X. Barril, Physico-Chemical And Computational Approaches To Drug Discovery. Royal Society Of Chemistry Pp. 124 (2012).

Leung, S.-H.S.; Robinson, J.R. The Contribution Of Anionic Polymer Structural Features To Mucoadhesion. J. Control. Release 1987, 5, 223–231.

Cook, S.L.; Bull, S.P.; Methven, L.; Parker, J.K.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V. Mucoadhesion: A Food Perspective. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 72, 281–296.

Shaikh, R.; Singh, T.R.R.; Garland, M.J.; Woolfson, A.D.; Donnelly, R.F. Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2011, 3, 89–100.

Paderni, C.; Compilato, D.; Giannola, L.I.; Campisi, G. Oral Local Drug Delivery And New Perspectives In Oral Drug Formulation. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2012, 114, E25–E34.

Chen, J.; Ahmad, R.; Li, W.; Swain, M.; Li, Q. Biomechanics Of Oral Mucosa. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12, 20150325.

Reddy Chinna, P.; Chaitanya, K.S.C.; Madhusudan Rao, Y. A Review On Bioadhesive Buccal Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status Of Formulation And Evaluation Methods. Daru J. Fac. Pharm. Tehran Univ. Med. Sci. 2011, 19, 385–403.

Shojaei, A.H. Buccal Mucosa As A Route For Systemic Drug Delivery: A Review. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 1, 15–30.

Abdullah, A.; Wahlgren, M.; Pedersen, L.; Engblom, J. Will A Water Gradient In Oral Mucosa Affect Transbuccal Drug Absorption? J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2018, 48, 338–345.

Pramanik, R.; Osailan, S.M.; Challacombe, S.J.; Urquhart, D.; Proctor, G.B. Protein And Mucin Retention On Oral Mucosal Surfaces In Dry Mouth Patients. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2010, 118, 245–253.

Mitul Patel, Asif Karigar Buccal Drug Delivery System .International Research Journal Of Pharmacy X(X), (2011)

Hägerström H, Edsman K, Strømme M. Low-Frequency Dielectric Spectroscopy As A Tool For Studying The Compatibility Between Pharmaceutical Gels And Mucus Tissue. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92:1869–81.

Alawdi S. Solanki AB. (2021). Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems: A Review Of Recent Developments. J Sci Res Med Biol Sci. 2(1), 50-64. Doi: 10.47631/Jsmbs.V211.213

Devi S, Bhatia M. Grewal S. (2021). Review: Polymers For Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems. Acta Pharm Sci, 59(2), 343- 362. Doi: 10.23893/1307-2080.APS.05919

Gremião MPD, Carvalho FC, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, Palmira M. Gremião D. (2010). Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems. Braz J Pharm Sci, 46(1).

R, S, D, S., & R, G. (2017). Review On Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery System With Special Emphasis On Buccal Route: An Important Tool In Designing Of Novel Controlled Drug Delivery System For The Effective Delivery Of Pharmaceuticals. Journal Of Developing Drugs, 06(01), Https://Doi.Org/10.4172/2329-6631.1000169

Serra L, Doménech J. Peppas NA. (2009). Engineering Design And Molecular Dynamics Of Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems As Targeting Agents. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 71(3), 519528. Doi: 10.1016/J.Ejpb.2008.09.022

Shaikh, R., Raj Singh, T., Garland, M., Woolfson, A., & Donnelly, R. (2011). Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems. In Journal Of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences, 3(1), 89-100. Https://Doi.Org/10.4103/0975-7406.76478

Scrivener, C.A.; Schantz, C.W. Penicillin: New Methods For Its Use In Dentistry. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1947, 35, 644–647.

Roy, S.; Pal, K.; Anis, A.; Pramanik, K.; Prabhakar, B. Polymers In Mucoadhesive Drug-Delivery Systems: A Brief Note. Des. Monomers Polym. 2009, 12, 483–495.

Puri, V.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, P.; Singh, I. Thiolation Of Biopolymers For Developing Drug Delivery Systems With Enhanced Mechanical And Mucoadhesive Properties: A Review. Polymers 2020, 12, 1803.

Kumar, K.; Dhawan, N.; Sharma, H.; Vaidya, S.; Vaidya, B. Bioadhesive Polymers: Novel Tool For Drug Delivery. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2014, 42, 274–283.

Khutoryanskiy, V.V. Advances In Mucoadhesion And Mucoadhesive Polymers. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 748–764.

Laffleur, F.; Bernkop-Schnürch, A. Strategies For Improving Mucosal Drug Delivery. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 2061–2075.

Jana, P.; Shyam, M.; Singh, S.; Jayaprakash, V.; Dev, A. Biodegradable Polymers In Drug Delivery And Oral Vaccination. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 142, 110155.

Sharma, R.; Agrawal, U.; Mody, N.; Vyas, S.P. Polymer Nanotechnology Based Approaches In Mucosal Vaccine Delivery: Challenges And Opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 64–79.

Sosnik, A.; Raskin, M.M. Polymeric Micelles In Mucosal Drug Delivery: Challenges Towards Clinical Translation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1380–1392.

Mansuri, S.; Kesharwani, P.; Jain, K.; Tekade, R.K.; Jain, N.K. Mucoadhesion: A Promising Approach In Drug Delivery System. React. Funct. Polym. 2016, 100, 151–172.

Rasenack N., Müller B.W. Micron-Size Drug Particles: Common And Novel Micronization Techniques. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2004;9:1–13. Doi: 10.1081/PDT-120027417.

Liversidge G.G., Cundy K.C. Particle Size Reduction For Improvement Of Oral Bioavailability Of Hydrophobic Drugs: I. Absolute Oral Bioavailability Of Nanocrystalline Danazol In Beagle Dogs. Int. J. Pharm. 1995;125:91–97. Doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00122-Y.

Verma S., Gokhale R., Burgess D.J. A Comparative Study Of Top-Down And Bottom-Up Approaches For The Preparation Of Micro/Nanosuspensions. Int. J. Pharm. 2009;380:216–222. Doi: 10.1016/J.Ijpharm.2009.07.005.

Van Eerdenbrugh B., Van Den Mooter G., Augustijns P. Top-Down Production Of Drug Nanocrystals: Nanosuspension Stabilization, Miniaturization And Transformation Into Solid Products. Int. J. Pharm. 2008;364:64–75. Doi: 10.1016/J.Ijpharm.2008.07.023.

Liversidge G.G., Conzentino P. Drug Particle Size Reduction For Decreasing Gastric Irritancy And Enhancing Absorption Of Naproxen In Rats. Int. J. Pharm. 1995;125:309–313. Doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00148-C.

Chingunpitak J. Nanosuspension Technology For Drug Delivery. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2006;4:139–153. Doi: 10.2004/Wjst.V4i2.94.

Muller R. Nanosuspension For The Formulation Of Poorly Soluble Drugs. In: Neilloud F., Marti-Mestres G., Editors. Pharmaceutical Emulsion And Suspension. Routledge; London, UK: 2000.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Mucoadhesive Delivery System : A Smart way to Improve Bioavailability of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. (2024). International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 11(2), 940-948. https://ijsrst.com/index.php/home/article/view/IJSRST24112158