CSR and Sustainability in the Cement Industry of Rajasthan: A Comparative Study of Company Performance and Stakeholders' Engagement (Based on Secondary Survey Reports)
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Sustainability Practices, Cement Industry, Rajasthan, Stakeholder Engagement, Environmental SustainabilityAbstract
This study aims to analyze the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainability practices in the cement industry of Rajasthan through a comparative approach. By focusing on secondary survey reports, the research examines the performance of cement companies in terms of their CSR initiatives, sustainability efforts, and stakeholder engagement. The cement industry, being a significant contributor to environmental impact, plays a crucial role in implementing eco-friendly practices, reducing carbon footprints, and ensuring social welfare in the surrounding communities. This study evaluates how various companies in Rajasthan have integrated sustainable development goals (SDGs) into their operations, with an emphasis on energy efficiency, waste management, water conservation, and renewable energy adoption. Additionally, it explores the involvement of stakeholders, including employees, local communities, and regulatory bodies, in promoting sustainable practices. Through this comparative study, the research highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the industry’s CSR initiatives and offers insights into enhancing corporate governance and stakeholder collaboration for sustainable development in the cement sector. The findings provide valuable recommendations for cement companies, policymakers, and stakeholders to improve their CSR and sustainability frameworks, ensuring a more sustainable and socially responsible future for the cement industry in Rajasthan.
Downloads
References
Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Value creation and poverty reduction. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), the APA handbook of industrial & organizational psychology, 3(855-879). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-024
Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L. J., and Scherer, A. G., in their work of 2013. Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size, as ever, plays a crucial role in the impact of natural disasters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1827-7
Carroll, A. and Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: The concepts, the research and the practice of an overview. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Further to the widely-held belief in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013;74(4):315–327. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075364
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2015). Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study on Board Diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333
A., Pérez *, P., M., and I., Rodríguez del Bosque (2013). The production of stakeholder-inclusive scale of the bank's socio-economic impact. Service Business, 7(3), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-012-0171- 9
Prno, J. (2013). Social license to operate is a key to mining industries. A comprehensive analysis of how it is established. Resources Policy, 38(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.010
Pope, A., Cohen, A. K., & Duarte, P. (2019). Making civic engagement go viral: Applying social epidemiology principles to civic education. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(1), e1857. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1857
Aguinis (2012), H. & Glavas, A., the effectiveness of ethical leadership has been proven in several studies. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: An agenda for research and review. Journal of Management 38(4) 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079.
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: To elaborate on the subject of business responsibility we have to go beyond the conventional myths. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123665
S. S. Vildåsen, S., Antonsen, S., & G. Jørgensen, (2017). Conceptualizing socially responsible leadership and diversity management: Leaders can serve as models. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: An international journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2017-0110
Jenkins, H., and Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Investigating asocial and environmental disclosure tendencies, 14, (3-4), 271-284 (April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004.
Negrea, S. (2021). What is Employee Engagement in Mining? Romania’s economic and business environment review, 16 (2), 63-71.
Hartmann, M. (2011). The implementation of the social responsibility principles by the food industry. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 297-324. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr031.
Ibañez, L. M. (2021). Relational work in Nicaragua’s low-wage labor market. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa027
Industry Scores. (Sawatch 2021). [Table with the example industry ESG scores].
Ma, A. (2021). Whether big tech companies align the compensation of their executives with the attainment of diversity goals or not. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-big-tech-companiesare-linking-executive-pay-to-meeting-diversity-goals-11624066398.
Alfayez, S. A., Suleiman, A. R., & Nehdi, M. L. (2019). Recycling Tire Rubber in Asphalt Pavements: State of the Art. Sustainability, 12(21), 9076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219076
McGain F, & Naylor C. (2014). Environmental sustainability in hospitals. A descriptive and analytical review of the topic and a suggestion of a research agenda. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy, 19(4), 245 – 252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614534836.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
